Centella asiatica increases hippocampal synaptic density and improves memory and executive function in aged mice
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Centella asiatica is a plant used for centuries to enhance memory. We have previously shown that a water extract of Centella asiatica (CAW) attenuates age‐related spatial memory deficits in mice and improves neuronal health. Yet the effect of CAW on other cognitive domains remains unexplored as does its mechanism of improving age‐related cognitive impairment. This study investigates the effects of CAW on a variety of cognitive tasks as well as on synaptic density and mitochondrial and antioxidant pathways. Methods: Twenty‐month‐old CB6F1 mice were treated with CAW (2 mg/ml) in their drinking water for 2 weeks prior to behavioral testing. Learning, memory, and executive function were assessed using the novel object recognition task (NORT), object location memory task (OLM), and odor discrimination reversal learning (ODRL) test. Tissue was collected for Golgi analysis of spine density as well as assessment of mitochondrial, antioxidant, and synaptic proteins. Results: CAW improved performance in all behavioral tests suggesting effects on hippocampal and cortical dependent memory as well as on prefrontal cortex mediated executive function. There was also an increase in synaptic density in the treated animals, which was accompanied by increased expression of the antioxidant response gene NRF2 as well as the mitochondrial marker porin. Conclusions: These data show that CAW can increase synaptic density as well as antioxidant and mitochondrial proteins and improve multiple facets of age‐related cognitive impairment. Because mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress also accompany cognitive impairment in many pathological conditions this suggests a broad therapeutic utility of CAW.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CAW treatment induces an NRF2-regulated antioxidant response in aged WT mice.
“We have confirmed that these mechanisms also operate in aging wild-type (WT) mice [1].”
From Centella Asiatica Improves Memory and Promotes Antioxidative Signaling in 5XFAD Mice (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
CAW treatment (200 mg/kg/d for four weeks) benefits aged WT mice in Morris water maze, object location, and novel object recognition.
“A treatment benefit of CAW (200 mg/kg/d for four weeks) in WT animals was previously reported both in male and female aged (20 month old) WT mice (as measured by Morris water maze, object location, and novel object recognition) [1,46].”
From Centella Asiatica Improves Memory and Promotes Antioxidative Signaling in 5XFAD Mice (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 76
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dev, R. D. O. M. S., Hambali, Z., & Samah, B. A. (2009). Comparison on cognitive effects of Centella asiatica in healthy middle aged female and male volunteers. European Journal of Scientific Research, 31, 553– 565.
- Authors
- Gray, N. E., Zweig, J. A., Caruso, M., Martin, M. D., Zhu, J. Y., Quinn, J. F., & Soumyanath, A.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gray, Nora E.
- Venue
- Brain and Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-06-19
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e01024-e01024
- ISSN
- 2157-9032 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-3279
- PMC
- PMC6043711
- OpenAlex
- W2809442797
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R00AT008831, R01 AT0008099)
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- Centella asiatica, aqueous extract, age-related cognitive impairment, executive function, memory, novel object recognition, object location memory, Nrf2, antioxidant response, mitochondrial dysfunction, porin, oxidative stress, prefrontal cortex, neuroprotection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antioxidants, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Mice, Transgenic, Mitochondria, Neurons, Plant Extracts, Reversal Learning, Synapses, Triterpenes, Prefrontal Cortex, Oxidative Stress, Centella, Olfactory Perception, Executive Function, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review