Cited by 128Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessFirm Innovation and Growth

Business Strategies of Incumbents in the Market for Electric Vehicles: Opportunities and Incentives for Sustainable Innovation

Open access
Wesseling, J. H., Niesten, E. M. M. I., Faber, J., Hekkert, M. P.·2015·Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract

This paper focuses on the relation between large car manufacturers’ incentive and opportunity to innovate and their electric vehicle (EV) business strategies. We analyze how environmental regulation and the firm's incentive (measured by net income) and opportunity to innovate (measured by EV asset position, determined from a combination of patent, partnership and prototype data) affected EV sales over the period 1990–2011. During the EV's R&D period in the 1990s, large car manufacturers that were regulated by the full zero emission vehicle mandate developed a significantly stronger EV asset position, but did not sell significantly more EVs than their rivals. During the EV's commercialization period (2007–2011), large car manufacturers with both a strong incentive and a strong opportunity to innovate sold significantly more EVs. Based on these results, the paper offers a typology of business strategies, several managerial implications, and recommendations for policy makers to stimulate sustainable development. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bse.1834

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wesseling, J. H., Niesten, E. M. M. I., Faber, J., & Hekkert, M. P.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Wesseling, J. H.
Venue
Business Strategy and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-28
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
518-531
ISSN
  • 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0836
OpenAlex
W1499376076
Cited by
128
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Business Strategy and the Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
Keywords
electric vehicles, incumbent firms, car manufacturers, business strategy, innovation incentives, environmental regulation, zero-emission vehicle mandate, EV sales, patent activity, partnership, prototype, sustainable innovation, sustainable development policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review