The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance
Abstract
Taking inspiration from the natural resource‐based view of the firm and resource orchestration theory, we propose a new approach, that is, natural resource orchestration, to investigate how green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting stimulate environmental performance. Using survey data collected from 106 chief financial officers (CFOs) of publicly listed companies in Iran, findings show that the elements of green intellectual capital (green human capital, green structural capital, and green relational capital) are positively associated with both environmental management accounting and environmental performance. In addition, findings support the hypothesis that the use of environmental management accounting mediates the relationship between green intellectual capital and environmental performance. This study provides fresh insights into how an organization deals with the effective alignment (i.e., orchestration) of various green resources, for example, green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting, to promote environmental performance. This is the first study ever to introduce the natural resource orchestration approach for examining how environmental management accounting appears to play a role in translating green intellectual capital into enhanced environmental performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203 · Cited by 27,541
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth
Krüger, P. (2015) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008 · Cited by 1,901
Predictive Analytics in Information Systems Research
Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. (2010) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1606674 · Cited by 676
Lisi, I. E. (2015) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2015.06.001 · Cited by 225
Cited by
Asiaei, K., O'Connor, N. G., Barani, O., & Joshi, M. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3136 · Cited by 334
Self-citationZameer, H., Shahbaz, M., & Kontoleon, A. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118567 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Alizadeh, R., & Yaghoubi, M.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-08-15
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-93
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W3193967698
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 38.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.