The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industrial ecology, life cycles, supply chains: differences and interrelations
Abstract
Within recent years, various concepts have arisen in environmental management that directly address the flow of material (and information) along life cycles or supply chains and thereby relate to inter‐organizational management aspects. These include industrial ecology (IE), life‐cycle management, closed‐loop supply chains, integrated chain management and green/environmental or sustainable supply chain management. It is not clear how these concepts relate to each other and whether or how they are different. Starting with sustainable development three criteria are identified that allow the comparison of the four concepts. Building on definitions the concepts are discussed and analysed using the three criteria while also identifying a distinctive feature of each approach. The criteria reveal that the concepts take a specific approach to study material flows in their particular system boundaries. This also relates to the time frame usually applied within the concept as well as the relevant actor network taken into account. Beyond these differences, it arises that the concepts have their strengths on different levels, which leads to a framework for the interrelation of the concepts. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard—Linking sustainability management to business strategy
Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.339 · Cited by 1,245
Designing the green supply chain
Beamon, B. M. (1999) · Logistics Information Management · doi:10.1108/09576059910284159 · Cited by 1,160
Cited by
Circular economy: The concept and its limitations
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · Cited by 3,961
Toward a Theory of Multi‐Tier Supply Chain Management
Mena, C., Humphries, A., & Choi, T. Y. (2013) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12003 · Cited by 483
Yang, C.-S., Lu, C.-S., Haider, J. J., & Marlow, P. B. (2013) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.005 · Cited by 345
Sustainable procurement practice
Meehan, J., & Bryde, D. (2011) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.678 · Cited by 304
A field-level examination of the adoption of sustainable procurement in the social housing sector
Meehan, J., & Bryde, D. J. (2015) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-07-2014-0359 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Seuring, S.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 306-319
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2104847291
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.