The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why SMEs invest in environmental measures: sustainability evidence from small and medium‐sized printing firms
Abstract
Why do SMEs invest in environmental measures? From the literature we know that most SMEs are rather slow in adopting these sustainable measures, but then the following question arises: why are other SMEs fast in this respect? From our research, it becomes clear that improving the working conditions is the most important reason why these fast‐going SMEs invest in environmental measures, as this probably improves their employees' motivation and performance. This explanation connects ‘planet’ and ‘people’ with each other, and does not exclude ‘profit’, which completes the traditional sustainability circle. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crossley, R. M., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Ntim, C. G. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2837 · Cited by 291
Improving the Sustainable Development of Firms: The Role of Employees
Wolf, J. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1731 · Cited by 157
Examining the role of procurement 4.0 towards remanufacturing operations and circular economy
Bag, S., Dhamija, P., Gupta, S., & Sivarajah, U. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1817602 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Masurel, E.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 190-201
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2143079816
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
