The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems
Abstract
Corporate sustainability, that is the capacity of a firm to continue operating over a long period of time, depends on the sustainability of its stakeholder relationships. This new stakeholder view of the firm goes beyond previous work on the triple bottom line and balanced scorecard. Companies need appropriate systems to measure and control their own behaviour in order to assess whether they are responding to stakeholder concerns in an effective way and to communicate the results achieved. These sustainability accounting systems should have the purpose of broadening and integrating the traditional financial approaches to corporate performance measurement, taking stakeholder needs into due account. This article presents the sustainability evaluation and reporting system (SERS), an integrated methodology aimed at monitoring and tracking from a qualitative and quantitative viewpoint the overall corporate performance according to a stakeholder framework, in line with small and medium‐sized enterprises' managerial requirements. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard—Linking sustainability management to business strategy
Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.339 · Cited by 1,245
Cited by
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1939 · Cited by 1,370
Business cases for sustainability: a stakeholder theory perspective
Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026617722882 · Cited by 477
Two Decades of Sustainability Management Tools for SMEs: How Far Have We Come?
Johnson, M. P., & Schaltegger, S. (2016) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12154 · Cited by 414
Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems
Bednar, P. M., & Welch, C. (2020) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09921-1 · Cited by 389
Singh, K., & Misra, M. (2021) · European Research on Management and Business Economics · doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.100139 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Perrini, F., & Tencati, A.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 296-308
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2119637352
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.538
- The paper
- Perrini, F., & Tencati, A. (2006). Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.