The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The road to cooperative supply‐chain environmental management: trust and uncertainty among pro‐active firms
Open accessAbstract
The pressures on firms to improve their environmental performance have caused them to look outside their boundaries towards their supply chains. In such approaches, firms work with vendors to develop the environmental profile of supplied materials (for example) by reducing materials' toxicity or the amount of packaging used. While large firms can mandate that their suppliers comply with such initiatives, more cooperative approaches are generally likely to be more fruitful. This article presents the results from an exploratory, two phase study of the conditions under which firms engage in cooperative supply‐chain environmental management. First, the authors conducted interviews with 14 leading‐edge firms. In the second phase, the authors conducted a theoretical‐sample survey to examine a model of the antecedents of cooperative supply‐chain environmental management. The results suggest that inter‐firm trust, uncertainty and pro‐active environmental management most directly affect the extent to which firms engage in cooperative supply‐chain environmental management. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 · Cited by 2,362
Cited by
A literature review on green supply chain management: Trends and future challenges
Tseng, M.-L., Islam, M. S., Karia, N., Fauzi, F. A., & Afrin, S. (2019) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.009 · Cited by 820
Sustainable procurement practice
Meehan, J., & Bryde, D. (2011) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.678 · Cited by 304
The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector
Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.008 · Cited by 292
Searcy, C., & Elkhawas, D. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.022 · Cited by 245
Delbufalo, E. (2012) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598541211246549 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M., & Anex, R. P.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-25
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W1970895429
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The road to cooperative supply‐chain environmental management: trust and uncertainty among pro‐active firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.580
- The paper
- Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M., & Anex, R. P. (2009). The road to cooperative supply‐chain environmental management: trust and uncertainty among pro‐active firms. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.