The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impacts from climate change on organizations: a conceptual foundation
Abstract
Physical impacts from climate change already pose major challenges for organizations, and the trend is rising. Organization theorists, however, have barely begun to systematically consider the organizational impacts of more and increasingly intense storms, floods, droughts, fires, sea level rise or changing growing seasons as part of their domain of study. Eight organizationally relevant dimensions of climate impacts are identified: severity, temporal scale, spatial scale, predictability, mode, immediacy, state change potential and accelerating trend potential. Combined, their scale, scope and systemic uncertainty suggest future conditions of systemic hyperturbulence in organizational environments, defined here as ‘massive discontinuous change’ (MDC). To build a conceptual foundation for organizations to respond and adapt to MDC, the paper examines contributions from literatures on the management of sustainability, crisis, risk, resilience and adaptive organizational change. It highlights gaps for addressing both business challenges and opportunities from MDC, and suggests avenues for future research. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00650-090205 · Cited by 7,821
Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002) · AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment · doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437 · Cited by 3,136
Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003 · Cited by 1,797
Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.192960 · Cited by 1,534
Who Sustains Whose Development? Sustainable Development and the Reinvention of Nature
Banerjee, S. B. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024001341 · Cited by 785
New challenges in organizational research: high reliability organizations
Roberts, K. H. (1989) · Industrial Crisis Quarterly · doi:10.1177/108602668900300202 · Cited by 218
Cited by
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1939 · Cited by 1,370
Systems thinking: A review of sustainability management research
Williams, A., Kennedy, S., Philipp, F., & Whiteman, G. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.002 · Cited by 473
Linnenluecke, M. K., Griffiths, A., & Winn, M. (2012) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.708 · Cited by 457
Self-citationFraming of Climate Change Impacts and Use of Management Accounting Practices
Faculty of Business and Law, S. U. O. T., Kumarasiri, J., Jubb, C., & Centre for Transformative Innovation, F. O. B. A. L. (2018) · Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance · doi:10.21315/aamjaf2017.13.2.3 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Winn, M., Kirchgeorg, M., Griffiths, A., Linnenluecke, M. K., & Günther, E.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-02-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 157-173
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2010408893
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
