The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supply chain management for sustainable products - insights from research applying mixed methodologies
Abstract
The significant growth in the academic literature on sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) can best be seen by the fact that three review papers have been published since 2007. In line with this, the question emerged – what distinguishes sustainable supply chain management from ‘conventional’ supply chain management? Here, the strategy of supply chain management for sustainable products proposed by Seuring and Müller (2008a) will be discussed. Against this background, this paper aims to develop a theory for sustainable supply chain management. While other contributions are taken into account, this will be primarily based on our own research spanning about 10 years and using multiple research methods. The empirical methods employed include: (1) case studies, (2) action research, (3) Delphi study, (4) survey research, and (5) literature reviews based on content analysis. The paper will provide insights into what was learned from the different research projects and how this has helped to gain a better and wider understanding of the field. This is discussed further by presenting hypotheses which should help to further advance the theory of supply chain management for sustainable products. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done
Bryman, A. (2006) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794106058877 · Cited by 3,354
Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: public sector perspectives
Walker, H., & Preuss, L. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.014 · Cited by 270
Cited by
A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains
Koberg, E., & Longoni, A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.033 · Cited by 729
Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Golpira, H., Sharif, A., & Mardani, A. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123357 · Cited by 432
Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management
Beske, P. (2012) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600031211231344 · Cited by 421
A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management
Ansari, Z. N., & Kant, R. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.023 · Cited by 377
Kannan, D. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.020 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Seuring, S.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-23
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 471-484
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022777949
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply chain management for sustainable products - insights from research applying mixed methodologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.702
- The paper
- Seuring, S. (2011). Supply chain management for sustainable products - insights from research applying mixed methodologies. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.