Inclusion, motivation, and good faith: The morality of coercion in mental hospital admission
Abstract
We administered a semi-structured interview to 157 patients shortly after their admission to a psychiatric hospital. In the first, and open-ended, part of the interview, patients were asked to talk about what had been going on in their lives that led to their coming into the hospital. Then, in a more structured format, they were asked more specific details about who was involved, the patients' relationships with those involved, whether any attempts were made to influence the patient to come into the hospital, and whether such attempts were perceived as fair by the patient. This article presents a qualitative review of the transcripts of a subset of these interviews. It attends specifically to patients' perceptions of the morality of attempts by others--primarily family members, friends and mental health professionals--to influence them to be admitted to the hospital, and of the morality of the process by which these influence attempts resulted in admission.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Factors that mitigated perceptions of coercion included being treated as an equal human being.
“Conversely, factors that mitigated perceptions of coercion included being treated as an equal human being [33,104]”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Factors that mitigated perceptions of coercion included perceiving professionals as well-qualified.
“perceiving professionals as well-qualified [33,49]”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Factors that mitigated perceptions of coercion included trusting that professionals had just intentions.
“and trusting that professionals had just intentions [33].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 152
- Authors
- Bennett, N. S., Lidz, C. W., Monahan, J., Mulvey, E. P., Hoge, S. K., Roth, L. H., & Gardner, W.
- Corresponding author
- Bennett, Nancy S.
- Venue
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-306
- ISSN
- 0735-3936 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0798
- OpenAlex
- W2040276878
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Keywords
- coercion, psychiatric hospital admissions, patient perspectives, family influence, mental health professionals, patient motivation, inclusion, good faith, involuntary psychiatric treatment
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Coercion, Family, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Morals, Motivation, Patient Participation, Pennsylvania, Virginia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review