The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Written content indicators of problematic approach behavior toward political officials
Abstract
Those charged with assessing and managing threatening communications must utilize risk factors that are behavioral, operational, and reasonably attainable during investigations. This project examined 326 written correspondence cases of an inappropriate, disruptive, or threatening nature that targeted political officials, with the specific goal of identifying written content indicators of problematic approach behavior. Results revealed that subjects who engaged in problematic approach activity toward their targets had more criminal history, past threat assessment activity, familiarity with firearms, past substance use, and indicators of serious mental illness. Approachers were more likely to engage in multiple contact methods, target dispersion, more overall contacts, and prior contact with their target. Numerous content themes were associated with future problematic approach, including longer handwritten correspondence, referencing specific events, making demands, mentioning stressors, focus on personal themes, feeling their rights were violated, and expressing an intention to approach. Harassing, insulting, and threatening language was not related to approach behavior. The implications of these findings are wide‐ranging for the practice of threat assessment. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research has posited mental illness should not be treated as a singular concept, and has, for example, found more validated relationships for either serious mental illness, specific disorders, or specific symptomatology (Schoeneman et al., 2011).”
From Unmet needs: analysing the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre’s fulfilment of the public health approach, and its value for violence prevention (2025) · cites this paper as Schoeneman et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Baumgartner J. V.(2003).Protective security cases: An examination of characteristics related to multiple approach contact behavior towards the U.S. Congress.Dissertation Abstracts International 64(09B) 4674. (UMI No. 3104604).
- 10.1300/J177v01n03_02 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199907/09)17:3<323::AID-BSL349>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
- 10.1080/08850600490446754 · DOI
- Borum R., 1996, Assessing and managing violence risk in clinical practice, Journal of Practical Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, 4, 205, 10.1097/00131746-199607000-00002 · DOI
- Brewster M. P., 2000, Stalking by former intimates: Verbal threats and other predictors of physical violence, Violence and Victims, 15, 41, 10.1891/0886-6708.15.1.41 · DOI
- Calhoun F. S., 1998, Hunters and howlers: Threats and violence against federal judicial officials in the United States, 1789–1993
- 10.1520/JFS13165J · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS13019J · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-4891-1_6 · DOI
- Fein R. A., 1998, Protective intelligence and threat assessment investigations: A guide for state and local law enforcement officials
- 10.1520/JFS14457J · DOI
- Fein R. A., 1995, Threat assessment: An approach to prevent targeted violence
- Fitch B., 2005, Communicating with Congress: How Capitol Hill is coping with the surge in citizen advocacy
- 10.1037/1076-8971.4.1-2.236 · DOI
- 10.1176/ps.48.9.1168 · DOI
- 10.3138/9781442688391-013 · DOI
- Melton G. B., 1997, Psychological evaluations for the courts
- 10.1037/0003-066X.47.4.511 · DOI
- Monahan J., Rethinking risk assessment and risk management
- Monahan J., 1994, Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment
- 10.1520/JFS15163J · DOI
- 10.1176/ajp.156.8.1244 · DOI
- 10.1037/10304-000 · DOI
- 10.1177/0093854803259241 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/009385402237998 · DOI
- 10.1002/bsl.525 · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS15575J · DOI
- 10.1300/J177v02n02_03 · DOI
- Schoeneman K. A., Differential risk factors for problematic approach behavior toward Legislators: Are letter writers or emailers more dangerous?
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00538.x · DOI
- 10.1002/cbm.375 · DOI
- Staub E., 2002, Ethnopolitical warfare: Causes, consequences, and possible solutions, 289
- Waller J., 2002, Becoming evil: How ordinary people commit genocide and mass killing, 10.1093/oso/9780195148688.001.0001 · DOI
Cited by
Seaward, A., Marchment, Z., Wilson, S., Elfituri, S., Farnham, F., Plumb, T., Rose, K., Taylor, A., Corner, E., & Gill, P. (2025) · Psychology, Crime & Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2025.2581795 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoeneman, K. A., Scalora, M. J., Darrow, C. D., McLawsen, J. E., Chang, G. H., & Zimmerman, W. J.
- Venue
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-02-23
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 284-301
- ISSN
- 0735-3936
- 1099-0798
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.