Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Written content indicators of problematic approach behavior toward political officials

Schoeneman, Katherine A., Scalora, Mario J., Darrow, Charles D., McLawsen, Julia E., Chang, Grace H., Zimmerman, William J.·2011·Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Abstract

Those charged with assessing and managing threatening communications must utilize risk factors that are behavioral, operational, and reasonably attainable during investigations. This project examined 326 written correspondence cases of an inappropriate, disruptive, or threatening nature that targeted political officials, with the specific goal of identifying written content indicators of problematic approach behavior. Results revealed that subjects who engaged in problematic approach activity toward their targets had more criminal history, past threat assessment activity, familiarity with firearms, past substance use, and indicators of serious mental illness. Approachers were more likely to engage in multiple contact methods, target dispersion, more overall contacts, and prior contact with their target. Numerous content themes were associated with future problematic approach, including longer handwritten correspondence, referencing specific events, making demands, mentioning stressors, focus on personal themes, feeling their rights were violated, and expressing an intention to approach. Harassing, insulting, and threatening language was not related to approach behavior. The implications of these findings are wide‐ranging for the practice of threat assessment. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bsl.977

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Baumgartner J. V.(2003).Protective security cases: An examination of characteristics related to multiple approach contact behavior towards the U.S. Congress.Dissertation Abstracts International 64(09B) 4674. (UMI No. 3104604).
  2. 10.1300/J177v01n03_02 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199907/09)17:3<323::AID-BSL349>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  4. 10.1080/08850600490446754 · DOI
  5. Borum R., 1996, Assessing and managing violence risk in clinical practice, Journal of Practical Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, 4, 205, 10.1097/00131746-199607000-00002 · DOI
  6. Brewster M. P., 2000, Stalking by former intimates: Verbal threats and other predictors of physical violence, Violence and Victims, 15, 41, 10.1891/0886-6708.15.1.41 · DOI
  7. Calhoun F. S., 1998, Hunters and howlers: Threats and violence against federal judicial officials in the United States, 1789–1993
  8. 10.1520/JFS13165J · DOI
  9. 10.1520/JFS13019J · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-1-4615-4891-1_6 · DOI
  11. Fein R. A., 1998, Protective intelligence and threat assessment investigations: A guide for state and local law enforcement officials
  12. 10.1520/JFS14457J · DOI
  13. Fein R. A., 1995, Threat assessment: An approach to prevent targeted violence
  14. Fitch B., 2005, Communicating with Congress: How Capitol Hill is coping with the surge in citizen advocacy
  15. 10.1037/1076-8971.4.1-2.236 · DOI
  16. 10.1176/ps.48.9.1168 · DOI
  17. 10.3138/9781442688391-013 · DOI
  18. Melton G. B., 1997, Psychological evaluations for the courts
  19. 10.1037/0003-066X.47.4.511 · DOI
  20. Monahan J., Rethinking risk assessment and risk management
  21. Monahan J., 1994, Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment
  22. 10.1520/JFS15163J · DOI
  23. 10.1176/ajp.156.8.1244 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/10304-000 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/0093854803259241 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1177/009385402237998 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/bsl.525 · DOI
  28. 10.1520/JFS15575J · DOI
  29. 10.1300/J177v02n02_03 · DOI
  30. Schoeneman K. A., Differential risk factors for problematic approach behavior toward Legislators: Are letter writers or emailers more dangerous?
  31. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00538.x · DOI
  32. 10.1002/cbm.375 · DOI
  33. Staub E., 2002, Ethnopolitical warfare: Causes, consequences, and possible solutions, 289
  34. Waller J., 2002, Becoming evil: How ordinary people commit genocide and mass killing, 10.1093/oso/9780195148688.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schoeneman, K. A., Scalora, M. J., Darrow, C. D., McLawsen, J. E., Chang, G. H., & Zimmerman, W. J.
Venue
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-23
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
284-301
ISSN
  • 0735-3936
  • 1099-0798
Cited by
15
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.