Viral vector‐based gene therapies in the clinic
Open accessAbstract
Gene therapies are currently one of the most investigated therapeutic modalities in both the preclinical and clinical settings and have shown promise in treating a diverse spectrum of diseases. Gene therapies aim at introducing a gene material in target cells and represent a promising approach to cure diseases that were thought to be incurable by conventional modalities. In many cases, a gene therapy requires a vector to deliver gene therapeutics into target cells; viral vectors are among the most widely studied vectors owing to their distinguished advantages such as outstanding transduction efficiency. With decades of development, viral vector‐based gene therapies have achieved promising clinical outcomes with many products approved for treating a range of diseases including cancer, infectious diseases and monogenic diseases. In addition, a number of active clinical trials are underway to further expand their therapeutic potential. In this review, we highlight the diversity of viral vectors, review approved products, and discuss the current clinical landscape of in vivo viral vector‐based gene therapies. We have reviewed 13 approved products and their clinical applications. We have also analyzed more than 200 active trials based on various viral vectors and discussed their respective therapeutic applications. Moreover, we provide a critical analysis of the major translational challenges for in vivo viral vector‐based gene therapies and discuss possible strategies to address the same.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AAV9 is not currently used in any clinical trials treating ocular-related diseases.
“AAV2 is being widely studied in clinics and is being used in gene therapies with marketing authorization, whereas AAV9 is not currently used in any clinical trials treating ocular-related diseases (Zhao et al., 2022).”
From AAV2 and AAV9 tropism and transgene expression in the mouse eye and major tissues after intravitreal and subretinal delivery (2023) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2022
AAV2 is being widely studied in clinics and is being used in gene therapies with marketing authorization.
“AAV2 is being widely studied in clinics and is being used in gene therapies with marketing authorization, whereas AAV9 is not currently used in any clinical trials treating ocular-related diseases (Zhao et al., 2022).”
From AAV2 and AAV9 tropism and transgene expression in the mouse eye and major tissues after intravitreal and subretinal delivery (2023) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 114 · Cited by 269
- Authors
- Zhao, Z., Anselmo, A. C., & Mitragotri, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Zongmin
- Anselmo, Aaron C.
- Mitragotri, Samir
- Venue
- Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-10-20
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e10258-e10258
- ISSN
- 2380-6761 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8780015
- OpenAlex
- W3199084338
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioengineering & Translational Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Hansjörg Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
- Keywords
- in vivo gene therapy, clinical trials, viral vectors, transduction efficiency, cancer gene therapy, monogenic disorders, translational challenges
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review