Cited by 17Protein purification and stabilityViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

Process analytics 4.0: A paradigm shift in rapid analytics for biologics development

Wasalathanthri, Dhanuka P., Shah, Ruchir, Ding, Julia, Leone, Anthony, Li, Zheng Jian·2021·Biotechnology Progress

Abstract

Analytical testing of product quality attributes and process parameters during the biologics development (Process analytics) has been challenging due to the rapid growth of biomolecules with complex modalities to support unmet therapeutic needs. Thus, the expansion of the process analytics tool box for rapid analytics with the deployment of cutting-edge technologies and cyber-physical systems is a necessity. We introduce the term, Process Analytics 4.0; which entails not only technology aspects such as process analytical technology (PAT), assay automation, and high-throughput analytics, but also cyber-physical systems that enable data management, visualization, augmented reality, and internet of things (IoT) infrastructure for real time analytics in process development environment. This review is exclusively focused on dissecting high-level features of PAT, automation, and data management with some insights into the business aspects of implementing during process analytical testing in biologics process development. Significant technological and business advantages can be gained with the implementation of digitalization, automation, and real time testing. A systematic development and employment of PAT in process development workflows enable real time analytics for better process understanding, agility, and sustainability. Robotics and liquid handling workstations allow rapid assay and sample preparation automation to facilitate high-throughput testing of attributes and molecul…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/btpr.3177

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wasalathanthri, D. P., Shah, R., Ding, J., Leone, A., & Li, Z. J.
Affiliations
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Wasalathanthri, Dhanuka P.
Venue
Biotechnology Progress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-31
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
e3177-e3177
ISSN
  • 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-7938
OpenAlex
W3165727984
Cited by
17
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology Progress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Keywords
process analytical technology, biopharmaceutical process development, real-time analytics, assay automation, cyber-physical systems, data management, Internet of Things, augmented reality, digitalization, automated liquid handling, product quality attributes, process parameters
MeSH terms
Automation, Biological Products, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review