The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2021
Open accessAbstract
There exist differences in the epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biological characteristics, treatment patterns, and drug selections between gastric cancer patients from the Eastern and Western countries. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) has organized a panel of senior experts specializing in all sub‐specialties of gastric cancer to compile a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer since 2016 and renews it annually. Taking into account regional differences, giving full consideration to the accessibility of diagnosis and treatment resources, these experts have conducted expert consensus judgment on relevant evidence and made various grades of recommendations for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer to reflect the value of cancer treatment and meeting health economic indexes in China. The 2021 CSCO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer covers the diagnosis, treatment, follow‐up, and screening of gastric cancer. Based on the 2020 version of the CSCO Chinese Gastric Cancer guidelines, this updated guideline integrates the results of major clinical studies from China and overseas for the past year, focused on the inclusion of research data from the Chinese population for more personalized and clinically relevant recommendations. For the comprehensive treatment of non‐metastatic gastric cancer, attentions were paid to neoadjuvant treatment. The value of perioperative chemotherapy is gradually becoming clearer and its recommendation level has been updated. For the comprehensive treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, recommendations for immunotherapy were included, and immune checkpoint inhibitors from third‐line to the first‐line of treatment for different patient groups with detailed notes are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21660 · Cited by 108,699
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3 · Cited by 17,242
Bang, Y.-J., Van Cutsem, E., Feyereislova, A., Chung, H. C., Shen, L., Sawaki, A., Lordick, F., Ohtsu, A., Omuro, Y., Satoh, T., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61121-x · Cited by 7,302
Self-citationMismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade
Le, D. T., Durham, J. N., Smith, K. N., Wang, H., Bartlett, B. R., Aulakh, L. K., Lu, S., Kemberling, H., Wilt, C., Luber, B. S., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan6733 · Cited by 6,645
Amin, M. B., Greene, F. L., Edge, S. B., Compton, C. C., Gershenwald, J. E., Brookland, R. K., Meyer, L., Gress, D. M., Byrd, D. R., & Winchester, D. P. (2017) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21388 · Cited by 6,502
Perioperative Chemotherapy versus Surgery Alone for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer
Cunningham, D., Allum, W. H., Stenning, S. P., Thompson, J. N., Van de Velde, C. J. H., Nicolson, M., Scarffe, J. H., Lofts, F. J., Falk, S. J., Iveson, T. J., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055531 · Cited by 6,334
LAURÉN, P. (1965) · Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/apm.1965.64.1.31 · Cited by 6,133
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal or Junctional Cancer
van Hagen, P., Hulshof, M. C. C. M., van Lanschot, J. J. B., Steyerberg, E. W., Henegouwen, M. I. V. B., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., Richel, D. J., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., Hospers, G. A. P., Bonenkamp, J. J., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1112088 · Cited by 5,521
WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System
Bosman, F. T. (2010) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,041
Cited by
Shah, M. A., Shitara, K., Ajani, J. A., Bang, Y.-J., Enzinger, P., Ilson, D., Lordick, F., Van Cutsem, E., Gallego Plazas, J., Huang, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02465-7 · Cited by 681
Self-citationPrognostic significance and immune characteristics of GPR27 in gastric cancer
Pan, J., & Gao, Y. (2023) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.205023 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, F., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Tang, L., Qu, X., Ying, J., Zhang, J., Sun, L., Lin, R., Qiu, H., Wang, C., Qiu, M., Cai, M., Wu, Q., Liu, H., Guan, W., Zhou, A., Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Bi, F., Yuan, X., Rao, S., Xin, Y., Sheng, W., Xu, H., Li, G., Ji, J., Zhou, Z., Liang, H., Zhang, Y., Jin, J., Shen, L., Li, J., & Xu, R.
- Venue
- Cancer Communications
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 747-795
- ISSN
- 1000-467X (ISSN-L)
- 2523-3548
- OpenAlex
- W4206757063
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 131
- FWCI
- 68.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2021. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cac2.12193
- The paper
- Wang, F., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Tang, L., Qu, X., Ying, J., Zhang, J., Sun, L., Lin, R., Qiu, H., Wang, C., Qiu, M., Cai, M., Wu, Q., Liu, H., Guan, W., Zhou, A., Zhang, Y., Liu, T., . . . Xu, R. (2021). The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2021. Cancer Communications. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
