The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inhibition of MMP 14 potentiates the therapeutic effect of temozolomide and radiation in gliomas
Abstract
Metalloproteinases are membrane‐bound proteins that play a role in the cellular responses to antiglioma therapy. Previously, it has been shown that treatment of glioma cells with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation (XRT) induces the expression of metalloproteinase 14 ( MMP 14). To investigate the role of MMP 14 in gliomagenesis, we used several chemical inhibitors which affect MMP 14 expression. Of all the inhibitors tested, we found that Marimastat not only inhibits the expression of MMP 14 in U87 and U251 glioma cells, but also induces cell cycle arrest. To determine the relationship between MMP 14 inhibition and alteration of the cell cycle, we used an RNA i technique. Genetic knockdown of MMP 14 in U87 and U251 glioma cells induced G 2 /M arrest and decreased proliferation. Mechanistically, we show that TMZ and XRT regulated expression of MMP 14 in clinical samples and in vitro models through downregulation of micro RNA 374. In vivo genetic knockdown of MMP 14 significantly decreased tumor growth of glioma xenografts and improved survival of glioma‐bearing mice. Moreover, the combination of MMP 14 silencing with TMZ and XRT significantly improved the survival of glioma‐bearing mice compared to a single modality treatment group. Therefore, we show that the inhibition of MMP 14 sensitizes tumor cells to TMZ and XRT and could be used as a future strategy for antiglioma therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pharmacological inhibition or gene silencing of MT1-MMP potentiates antiglioma therapies using either combined temozolomide/radiation therapy or glioma virotherapy.
“Interestingly, pharmacological inhibition or gene silencing of MT1-MMP has been shown to potentiate antiglioma therapies using either combined temozolomide/radiation therapy [47] or glioma virotherapy [48].”
From MT1-MMP Expression Levels and Catalytic Functions Dictate LDL Receptor-Related Protein-1 Ligand Internalization Capacity in U87 Glioblastoma Cells (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318246040c · DOI
- Alexiou G. A., 2012, Fotopoulos A
- 10.3892/or_00000795 · DOI
- 10.5306/wjco.v3.i5.67 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.020 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110.147330 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.1294605 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3255 · DOI
- Deng Y. P., 2009, MT1‐MMP up‐regulates VEGF expression in human breast carcinoma MCF‐7 cells and induces tumor angiogenesis, Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, 31, 727
- Jiang W. G., 2006, Expression of membrane type‐1 matrix metalloproteinase, MT1‐MMP in human breast cancer and its impact on invasiveness of breast cancer cells, Int. J. Mol. Med., 17, 583
- 10.1083/jcb.200408028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.05.059 · DOI
- Tolde O., 2010, Neoplastic progression of the human breast cancer cell line G3S1 is associated with elevation of cytoskeletal dynamics and upregulation of MT1‐MMP, Int. J. Oncol., 36, 833
- 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7494 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0035857 · DOI
- 10.1124/mol.106.022194 · DOI
- Martinou M., 2011, Ionizing radiation affects epidermal growth factor receptor signalling and metalloproteinase secretion in glioma cells, Cancer Genomics Proteomics, 8, 33
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4340 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.05.026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.064 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11060-006-9160-y · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1383 · DOI
- 10.3171/jns.2007.106.4.646 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1856 · DOI
- 10.1186/1476-4598-9-201 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.01.105 · DOI
- 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0399 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.018 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-0030-1249698 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02482184 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0736-5748(99)00010-6 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1006421112839 · DOI
- 10.3171/jns.1994.81.1.0069 · DOI
- Choe G., 2002, Active matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression is associated with primary glioblastoma subtype, Clin. Cancer Res., 8, 2894
- Leinonen T., 2008, Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase‐2 (MMP‐2) predicts tumour recurrence and unfavourable outcome in non‐small cell lung cancer, Histol. Histopathol., 23, 693
- 10.18632/oncotarget.373 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10620-006-9535-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10350-004-6236-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11060-005-9098-5 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pratt, J., Haidara, K., & Annabi, B. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms232214214 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Ulasov, I., Thaci, B., Sarvaiya, P., Yi, R., Guo, D., Auffinger, B., Pytel, P., Zhang, L., Kim, C. K., Borovjagin, A., Dey, M., Han, Y., Baryshnikov, A. Y., & Lesniak, M. S.
- Affiliations
- The Brain Tumor Center The University of Chicago Chicago Illinois 60637
- Department of Pathology The University of Chicago Chicago Illinois 60637
- Department of Periodontology School of Dentistry UAB Birmingham Alabama 35294
- Institute of Experimental Biotherapy NN Blokhin Research Cancer Center RAMS Kashirskoe Shosse 24 Moscow Russia
- Venue
- Cancer Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06-30
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 457-467
- ISSN
- 2045-7634
- PMC
- PMC3799280
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review