Cited by 38Bone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Digital PCR analysis of circulating tumor DNA: A biomarker for chondrosarcoma diagnosis, prognostication, and residual disease detection

Open access
Gutteridge, Alice, Rathbone, Victoria M., Gibbons, Rebecca, Bi, Mark, Archard, Nicholas, Davies, Kate E. J., Brown, Jake, Plagnol, Vincent +7 more·2017·Cancer Medicine

Abstract

Conventional chondrosarcoma is the most common primary bone tumor in adults. Prognosis corresponds with tumor grade but remains variable, especially for individuals with grade (G) II disease. There are currently no biomarkers available for monitoring or prognostication of chondrosarcoma. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has recently emerged as a promising biomarker for a broad range of tumor types. To date, little has been done to study the presence of ctDNA and its potential utility in the management of sarcomas, including chondrosarcoma. In this study, we have assessed ctDNA levels in a cohort of 71 patients, 32 with sarcoma, including 29 individuals with central chondrosarcoma (CS) and 39 with locally aggressive and benign bone and soft tissue tumors, using digital PCR. In patients with CS, ctDNA was detected in pretreatment samples in 14/29 patients, which showed clear correlation with tumor grade as demonstrated by the detection of ctDNA in all patients with GIII and dedifferentiated disease (n = 6) and in 8/17 patients with GII disease, but never associated with GI CS. Notably detection of ctDNA preoperatively in GII disease was associated with a poor outcome. A total of 14 patients with CS had ctDNA levels assessed at multiple time points and in most patients there was a clear reduction following surgical removal. This research lays the foundation for larger studies to assess the utility of ctDNA for chondrosarcoma diagnosis, prognostication, early detection of residual disease and monitoring disease progression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cam4.1146

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 38

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Evans, H. L., A. G. Ayala, and M. M. Romsdahl. 1977 Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone: a clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic grading. Cancer 40: 818– 831. 890662

Authors
Gutteridge, A., Rathbone, V. M., Gibbons, R., Bi, M., Archard, N., Davies, K. E. J., Brown, J., Plagnol, V., Pillay, N., Amary, F., O'Donnell, P., Gupta, M., Tirabosco, R., Flanagan, A. M., & Forshew, T.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust (Radiology) Stanmore United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Flanagan, Adrienne M.
Venue
Cancer Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-23
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
2194-2202
ISSN
2045-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2745690890
Cited by
38
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sarcoma UK
  • National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
chondrosarcoma, circulating tumor DNA, liquid biopsy, digital PCR, tumor grade, prognostic factors, residual disease detection, dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, bone tumors, soft tissue tumor, disease surveillance
MeSH terms
Circulating Tumor DNA, Bone Neoplasms, Chondrosarcoma, Humans, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase, Mutation, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Neoplasm, Residual, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review