Cited by 24Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesBreast Lesions and CarcinomasMRI in cancer diagnosis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pathological complete response and prognosis in patients with breast cancer

Open access

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive breast cancer patients treated with NAC between August 2008 and November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. TIL levels were evaluated of invasive tumor samples, and high expression was defined as TILs >10%. Total pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as no invasive tumor in the breast or lymph nodes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess factors associated with pCR rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients were included. The mean pre-NAC TIL level was higher among patients with pCR than among patients without pCR (24.28% ± 2.34% vs. 11.34% ± 0.60%, respectively, p < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that a high pre-NAC TIL level was an independent risk factor for a higher pCR (odds ratio = 3.92, 95% CI = 2.23-6.90, p < 0.001). Patients with high pre-NAC TIL levels had a better 5-year DFS than those with low pre-NAC TIL levels (84.5% vs. 68.9%, HR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.31-0.81, p = 0.005). The multivariate analysis showed that pre-NAC TIL (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.29-0.81, p = 0.006) but not post-NAC TIL (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.50-1.59, p = 0.699) was significantly associated with DFS among patients without pCR. Furthermore, patients with low pre- and post-NAC TIL levels had a worse 5-year DFS than those with high pre-NAC TIL levels (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.23-3.56, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-NAC TIL level can predict pCR and DFS in patients with breast cancer receiving NAC. For patients without pCR, pre-NAC TIL, and TIL category change, but not post-NAC TIL, were significantly associated with DFS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cam4.4302

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE 1 Distributions of pre‐NAC TILs and associations with pathological response. (A) Distribution of pre‐NAC TILs in all patients and the HR+HER2−, HER2+, and TNBC subgroups; (B) Mean pre‐NAC TIL of patients by molecular subtype; (C) Total pCR rate by 10% increment of pre‐NAC TIL; (D) Mean pre‐NAC TILs among patients with total pCR or non‐pCR; (E) Associations between pre‐NAC TIL and Miller‐Payne grade after NAC; (F) Area under the curve of pre‐NAC TIL for total pCR; (G) Total pCR rate of patients with high versus low pre‐NAC TILs. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormonal receptor; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ns, nonsignificant; pCR, pathological complete response; TILs, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC, triple‐negative breast cancer. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001
FIGURE 1 Distributions of pre‐NAC TILs and associations with pathological response. (A) Distribution of pre‐NAC TILs in all patients and the HR+HER2−, HER2+, and TNBC subgroups; (B) Mean pre‐NAC TIL of patients by molecular subtype; (C) Total pCR rate by 10% increment of pre‐NAC TIL; (D) Mean pre‐NAC TILs among patients with total pCR or non‐pCR; (E) Associations between pre‐NAC TIL and Miller‐Payne grade after NAC; (F) Area under the curve of pre‐NAC TIL for total pCR; (G) Total pCR rate of patients with high versus low pre‐NAC TILs. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormonal receptor; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ns, nonsignificant; pCR, pathological complete response; TILs, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC, triple‐negative breast cancer. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 2 Disease‐free survival and overall survival by pre‐NAC TIL category in the whole population. (A) DFS of all patients; (B) DFS of patients with the HR+HER2− subtype; (C) DFS of patients with the HER2+ subtype; (D) DFS of patients with the TNBC subtype; (E) OS of all patients; (F) OS of patients with the HR+HER2− subtype; (G) OS of patients with the HER2+ subtype; (H) OS of patients with the TNBC subtype. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormonal receptor; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; TILs, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC, triple‐negative breast cancer
FIGURE 2 Disease‐free survival and overall survival by pre‐NAC TIL category in the whole population. (A) DFS of all patients; (B) DFS of patients with the HR+HER2− subtype; (C) DFS of patients with the HER2+ subtype; (D) DFS of patients with the TNBC subtype; (E) OS of all patients; (F) OS of patients with the HR+HER2− subtype; (G) OS of patients with the HER2+ subtype; (H) OS of patients with the TNBC subtype. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormonal receptor; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; TILs, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC, triple‐negative breast cancerCC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 3 Distributions of post‐NAC TILs and associations with pathological response and survival among patients with invasive residual breast tumor after NAC. (A) Distribution of post‐NAC TILs in all patients and the HR+HER2−, HER2+, and TNBC subgroups; (B) associations between post‐NAC TIL and Miller‐Payne grade after NAC; (C) disease‐free survival by post‐NAC TIL category; (D) overall survival by post‐NAC TIL category. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormonal receptor; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; TILs, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC, triple‐negative breast cancer
FIGURE 3 Distributions of post‐NAC TILs and associations with pathological response and survival among patients with invasive residual breast tumor after NAC. (A) Distribution of post‐NAC TILs in all patients and the HR+HER2−, HER2+, and TNBC subgroups; (B) associations between post‐NAC TIL and Miller‐Payne grade after NAC; (C) disease‐free survival by post‐NAC TIL category; (D) overall survival by post‐NAC TIL category. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormonal receptor; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; TILs, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC, triple‐negative breast cancerCC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 4 Changes in TILs before versus after NAC and associations with survival in patients with invasive residual breast tumors after NAC. (A) Changes in TILs in all patients; (B) changes in TILs in the HR+HER2− subgroup; (C) changes in TILs in the HER2+ subgroup; (D) changes in TILs in the TNBC subgroup; (E) DFS by change in TIL category in all patients; (F) DFS by change in TIL category in the HR+HER2− subgroup; (G) DFS by change in TILs category in the HER2+ subgroup; (H) DFS by change in TIL category in the TNBC subgroup; (I) OS by change in TILs in all patients; (J) distributions of changes in TILs in all patients by molecular subgroup. DFS, disease‐free survival; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormonal receptor; OS, overall survival; TILs, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC, triple‐negative breast cancer; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy. *Group A: pre‐NAC TILs > 10% regardless of post‐NAC TILs; Group B: pre‐NAC TILs ≤ 10% and post‐NAC TILs > 10%; Group C: pre‐NAC and post‐NAC TILs ≤ 10%
FIGURE 4 Changes in TILs before versus after NAC and associations with survival in patients with invasive residual breast tumors after NAC. (A) Changes in TILs in all patients; (B) changes in TILs in the HR+HER2− subgroup; (C) changes in TILs in the HER2+ subgroup; (D) changes in TILs in the TNBC subgroup; (E) DFS by change in TIL category in all patients; (F) DFS by change in TIL category in the HR+HER2− subgroup; (G) DFS by change in TILs category in the HER2+ subgroup; (H) DFS by change in TIL category in the TNBC subgroup; (I) OS by change in TILs in all patients; (J) distributions of changes in TILs in all patients by molecular subgroup. DFS, disease‐free survival; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormonal receptor; OS, overall survival; TILs, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC, triple‐negative breast cancer; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy. *Group A: pre‐NAC TILs > 10% regardless of post‐NAC TILs; Group B: pre‐NAC TILs ≤ 10% and post‐NAC TILs > 10%; Group C: pre‐NAC and post‐NAC TILs ≤ 10%CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Hong, J., Rui, W., Fei, X., Chen, X., & Shen, K.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Xiaosong
  • Shen, Kunwei
Venue
Cancer Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-09-25
Volume
10
Issue
22
Pages
7921-7933
ISSN
2045-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3200545581
Cited by
24
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772797, 82072897, 82072937)
  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (20172007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
Keywords
tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological complete response, predictive biomarkers, prognostic factors, disease-free survival, overall survival, tumor immune microenvironment, treatment response prediction, prognostic stratification, triple-negative breast cancer, HER2-positive breast cancer, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review