Cited by 51Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

Learning from long‐term adolescent and young adult ( AYA ) cancer survivors regarding their age‐specific care needs to improve current AYA care programs

Open access
Janssen, Silvie H. M., Vlooswijk, Carla, Manten‐Horst, Eveliene, Sleeman, Sophia H. E., Bijlsma, Rhodé M., Kaal, Suzanne E. J., Kerst, Jan Martijn, Tromp, Jacqueline M. +7 more·2023·Cancer Medicine

Abstract

Background: Despite growing (inter)national awareness and appreciation, age‐specific care is still not always self‐evident and accepted as standard of care for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. It is unknown whether long‐term AYA cancer survivors have missed age‐specific care, and if so, which survivors missed it and regarding which topics. Methods: The Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) identified all long‐term AYA cancer survivors (aged 18–39 years at initial cancer diagnosis, 5–20 years past diagnosis) in the Netherlands, who were invited to participate in a population‐based, observational, cross‐sectional questionnaire study (SURVAYA study), including questions on care needs. Results: In total, 3.989 AYAs participated (35.3% response rate). One‐third of them had a need for age‐specific care (33.5%), 41.2% had no need and 25.3% did not know whether they had a need. Those who had a need for age‐specific care were significantly more often female, higher educated, diagnosed at a younger age, and treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or hormone therapy. Most frequent topics were disease and treatment (29.7%), emotions (24.1%), friends (22.6%), family and children (15.6%), fertility and pregnancy (14.8%), work and reintegration (10.5%), care not tailored (13.8%), and overarching care and life (27.7%). Palliative care (0.0%), spirituality (0.2%), death (0.7%), complementary care (0.7%), and late effects (1.3%) were mentioned least. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of long‐term AYA cancer survivors showed a need for age‐specific care, varying by sociodemographic and clinical factors, on a wide variety of topics, which could be targeted to improve current AYA care services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cam4.6001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • YA have limited opportunities to connect with other YA with cancer following diagnosis and often feel as though their peers, family, and members of their community do not understand what it is like to be a young person who has had cancer.

    “Our work [33] and the work of others [53, 54, 85] suggest that YA have limited opportunities to connect with other YA with cancer following diagnosis and often feel as though their peers, family, and members of their community do not understand what it is like to be a young person who has had cancer.”

    From Improving symptom management for survivors of young adult cancer: rationale and study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Results section reports a need for contact with peers who have cancer, difficulty staying connected to healthy peers, and that some survivors feel misunderstood by their surroundings. A survivor also describes wanting group contact about six months after diagnosis. The paper does not establish that opportunities to connect are generally limited or that survivors often feel misunderstood by each of the named groups—peers, family, and community members. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 51

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Adolescent Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group. Closing the gap: research and care imperatives for adolescents and young adults with cancer. 2006.

Authors
Janssen, S. H. M., Vlooswijk, C., Manten‐Horst, E., Sleeman, S. H. E., Bijlsma, R. M., Kaal, S. E. J., Kerst, J. M., Tromp, J. M., Bos, M. E. M. M., van der Hulle, T., Lalisang, R. I., Nuver, J., Kouwenhoven, M. C. M., van der Graaf, W. T. A., & Husson, O.
Affiliations
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (NL)
  • Dutch AYA ‘Young & Cancer’ Care Network Utrecht The Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Department of Medical Oncology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Department of Medical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Amsterdam The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Husson, Olga
Venue
Cancer Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-04-29
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
13712-13731
ISSN
2045-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367369441
Cited by
51
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 4
FWCI
18.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • KWF Kankerbestrijding (11788)
  • Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (480‐08‐009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, long-term cancer survivors, care needs, survivorship care, work reintegration, emotional support, sociodemographic factors
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Survivors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review