Variation in Phenolic Content, Profile, and Antioxidant Activity of Seeds among Different Paeonia ostii Cultivated Populations in China
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the phenolic profiles of seeds from fifteen Paeonia ostii cultivated populations in China and identify their relationship with antioxidant activities and associated environmental factors. Thirteen individual phenolic compounds were quantitatively determined by HPLC, and (+)‐catechin was the most abundant phenolic compound in the seeds. Correlation analysis showed that phenolics were the most effective antioxidant compound class by evaluating DPPH, ABTS, and hydroxyl radical scavenging activities as well as ferric reducing antioxidant power. Latitude and annual rainfall had significant effects on the contents of many phenolic compounds, and elevation was only significantly correlated with gallic acid content. Within fifteen P. ostii cultivated populations, the seeds of Tongling population exhibited the highest phenolic contents and strongest antioxidant activities. These results suggest that Tongling population has a relatively high utilization value and a potential for sources of natural antioxidants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar improvements in total phenolic content have been reported in cereal- and fruit-based substrates fermented with lactic acid bacteria and yeasts.
“Similar improvements have been reported in cereal-and fruit-based substrates fermented with lactic acid bacteria and yeasts (Kantachote et al., 2017;Zhang et al., 2018).”
From Antioxidant Activity and Antibacterial Activity of Fermented Coconut Water by L. Plantarum and L. Fermentum (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jiang, S., Hun, T. G., Chong, K. H., & Nor-Khaizura, M. A. R. (2025) · International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences · doi:10.14419/s2v9er57
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Zhang, G., Jin, M., Niu, L., & Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- College of Landscape Architecture and Arts Northwest A&F University No. 3 Taicheng Road Yangling Shaanxi 712100 P. R. China
- Venue
- Chemistry & Biodiversity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1612-1872
- 1612-1880
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Special Public Welfare Industry Research Projects of National Forestry Bureau, China (201404701)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review