The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein‐Detecting Microarrays: Current Accomplishments and Requirements
Abstract
The sequencing of the human genome has been successfully completed and offers the chance of obtaining a large amount of valuable information for understanding complex cellular events simply and rapidly in a single experiment. Interestingly, in addressing these proteomic studies, the importance of proteindetecting microarray technology is increasing. In the coming few years, microarray technology will become a significantly promising and indispensable research/diagnostic tool from just a speculative technology. It is clear that the protein‐detecting microarray is supported by three independent but strongly related technologies (surface chemistry, detection methods, and capture agents). Firstly, a variety of surface‐modification methodologies are now widely available and offer site‐specific immobilization of capture agents onto surfaces in such a way as to keep the native conformation and activity. Secondly, sensitive and parallel detection apparatuses are being developed to provide highly engineered microarray platforms for simultaneous data acquisition. Lastly, in the development of capture agents, antibodies are now probably the most prominent capture agents for analyzing protein abundances. Alternative scaffolds, such as phage‐displayed antibody and protein fragments, which provide the advantage of increasing diversity of proteinic capture agents, however, are under development. An approach involving recombinant proteins fused with affinity tag(s) and coupled with a highly engineered surface chemistry will provide simple production protocols and specific orientations of capture agents on the microarray formats. Peptides and other small molecules can be employed in screening highly potent ligands as well as in measuring enzymatic activities. Protein‐detecting microarrays supported by the three key technologies should contribute in accelerating diagnostic/biological research and drug discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tornøe, C. W., Christensen, C., & Meldal, M. (2002) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo011148j · Cited by 8,696
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Drummond, T. G., Hill, M. G., & Barton, J. K. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt873 · Cited by 2,214
Global Analysis of Protein Activities Using Proteome Chips
Zhu, H., Bilgin, M., Bangham, R., Hall, D., Casamayor, A., Bertone, P., Lan, N., Jansen, R., Bidlingmaier, S., Houfek, T., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062191 · Cited by 1,884
Cited by
Selective Protein Capture by Epitope Imprinting
Nishino, H., Huang, C., & Shea, K. J. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200503760 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomizaki, K., Usui, K., & Mihara, H.
- Venue
- ChemBioChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-22
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 782-799
- ISSN
- 1439-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-7633
- OpenAlex
- W2032699581
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein‐Detecting Microarrays: Current Accomplishments and Requirements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cbic.200400232
- The paper
- Tomizaki, K., Usui, K., & Mihara, H. (2005). Protein‐Detecting Microarrays: Current Accomplishments and Requirements. ChemBioChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200400232
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.