The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Addressing the Numbers Problem in Directed Evolution
Abstract
Our previous contribution to increasing the efficiency of directed evolution is iterative saturation mutagenesis (ISM) as a systematic means of generating focused libraries for the control of substrate acceptance, enantioselectivity, or thermostability of enzymes. We have now introduced a crucial element to knowledge‐guided targeted mutagenesis in general that helps to solve the numbers problem in directed evolution. We show that the choice of the amino acid (aa) alphabet, as specified by the utilized codon degeneracy, provides the experimenter with a powerful tool in designing “smarter” randomized libraries that require considerably less screening effort. A systematic comparison of two different codon degeneracies was made by examining the relative quality of the identically sized enzyme libraries in relation to the degree of oversampling required in the screening process. The specific example in our case study concerns the conventional NNK codon degeneracy (32 codons/20 aa) versus NDT (12 codons/12 aa). The model reaction is the hydrolytic kinetic resolution of a chiral trans ‐disubstituted epoxide, catalyzed by the epoxide hydrolase from Aspergillus niger . The NDT library proves to be of much higher quality, as measured by the dramatically higher frequency of positive variants and by the magnitude of catalyst improvement (enhanced rate and enantioselectivity). We provide a statistical analysis that constitutes a useful guide for the optimal design and generation of “smarter” focused libraries. This type of approach accelerates the process of laboratory evolution considerably and can be expected to be broadly applicable when engineering functional proteins in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robustness–epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein
Bershtein, S., Segal, M., Bekerman, R., Tokuriki, N., & Tawfik, D. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05385 · Cited by 414
On Reduced Amino Acid Alphabets for Phylogenetic Inference
Susko, E., & Roger, A. J. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm144 · Cited by 177
Cited by
Directed evolution drives the next generation of biocatalysts
Turner, N. J. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.203 · Cited by 785
Explorations and Applications of Enzyme-linked Bioremediation of Synthetic Dyes
Ogola, H. J. O., Ashida, H., Ishikawa, T., & Sawa, Y. (2015) · Advances in Bioremediation of Wastewater and Polluted Soil · doi:10.5772/60753 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Reetz, M. T., Kahakeaw, D., & Lohmer, R.
- Venue
- ChemBioChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1797-1804
- ISSN
- 1439-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-7633
- OpenAlex
- W2086462671
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.