Exosomes as Targeted Delivery Platform of CRISPR/Cas9 for Therapeutic Genome Editing
Abstract
Therapeutic genome editing harnesses the power of genome editing tools to correct erroneous genes associated with disease pathology. To bring the CRISPR/Cas9 tool from the bench to the bedside, a critical hurdle is the safe and efficient delivery of this nucleic acid tool to the desired type of cells in patients. This review discusses the use of natural carriers, extracellular vesicles (EVs), in particular exosomes, to fill the gap. Exosomes are lipid‐containing nanovesicle released by various types of cells to mediate cell‐cell communications. Their inherent long‐distance transportation capability, biocompatibility, and engineerability have made EVs potential vehicles for delivering therapeutic drugs. We summarize the recent progress of harnessing exosomes as delivery vehicles for the CRISPR/Cas system to achieve therapeutic gene editing for disease treatment, with a focus on various strategies to achieve selective delivery to a particular type of cell and efficient packaging of the genome editing tools in the vesicles. Critical issues and possible solutions in the design and engineering of the targeting vehicles are highlighted. Taken together, we demonstrate EV/exosome‐mediated packaging of the nucleic acid/protein tools and the cell/tissue‐targeted delivery to be a viable way towards the clinical translation of the CRISPR/Cas9 technology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two main approaches can be used to enhance targeting ability of exosomes: direct chemical modification or indirect genetic engineering.
“Two main approaches can be used to enhance the targeting ability of exosomes for specific applications: direct modification of exosomes by chemical means or, indirect manipulation of the donor cells through genetic engineering techniques [89, 103, 118–120]”
From Exosome for mRNA delivery: Strategies and therapeutic applications (2024) · cites this paper as [118]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Duan, L., Ouyang, K., Wang, J., Xu, L., Xu, X., Wen, C., Xie, Y., Liang, Y., & Xia, J.
- Affiliations
- Shenzhen University (CN)
- Shenzhen KangNing Hospital (CN)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Liang, Yujie
- Xia, Jiang
- Venue
- ChemBioChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-09-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3360-3368
- ISSN
- 1439-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-7633
- OpenAlex
- W3193641400
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ChemBioChem (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972116, 81972085, 81772394)
- Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (SZSM201612079)
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M682907)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- exosomes, CRISPR/Cas9, therapeutic genome editing, extracellular vesicles, nucleic acid delivery, targeted delivery, cell targeting, vesicle engineering, clinical translation, lipid nanovesicles
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Humans, Genetic Therapy, Gene Transfer Techniques, Exosomes, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review