The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research
Abstract
Background: The product‐moment correlation r is widely used in criminology and psychiatry to measure strength of association. However, most criminological and psychiatric variables contravene its underlying assumptions. Aim: To compare statistical measures of association based on dichotomous variables with the use of r. Method: Explanatory variables for delinquency are investigated in the Pittsburgh Youth Study using a sample of 506 boys aged 13–14. Results: Dichotomization does not necessarily cause a decrease in measured strength of associations. Conclusions about the most important explanatory variables for delinquency were not greatly affected by using dichotomous as opposed to continuous variables, by different dichotomization splits, or by using logistic versus OLS multiple regression. Non‐linear relationships, interaction effects and multiple risk factor individuals were easily studied using dichotomous data. Conclusions: Dichotomization produces meaningful findings that are easily understandable to a wide audience. Measures of association for dichotomous variables, such as the odds ratio, have many advantages and are often more realistic and meaningful measures of strength of relationship than the product‐moment correlation r. Copyright © 2000 Whurr Publishers Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Comorbidity in Child Psychopathology: Concepts, Issues and Research Strategies
Caron, C., & Rutter, M. (1991) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00350.x · Cited by 1,051
Zhao, L. P., & Kolonel, L. N. (1992) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116520 · Cited by 108
Cited by
Cumulative risk and child development.
Evans, G. W., Li, D., & Whipple, S. S. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0031808 · Cited by 2,024
Lee, S. S., Humphreys, K. L., Flory, K., Liu, R., & Glass, K. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.01.006 · Cited by 875
Resilience Building in Students: The Role of Academic Self-Efficacy
Cassidy, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01781 · Cited by 495
FARRINGTON, D. P., JOLLIFFE, D., LOEBER, R., STOUTHAMER-LOEBER, M., & KALB, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1006/jado.2001.0424 · Cited by 476
Self-citationBest Practices for Using Median Splits, Artificial Categorization, and their Continuous Alternatives
DeCoster, J., Gallucci, M., & Iselin, A.-M. R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.5127/jep.008310 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R.
- Venue
- Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 100-122
- ISSN
- 0957-9664 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2857
- OpenAlex
- W2039702319
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cbm.349
- The paper
- Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (2000). Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.