Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative

Basir, Mir B., Schreiber, Theodore, Dixon, Simon, Alaswad, Khaldoon, Patel, Kirit, Almany, Steven, Khandelwal, Akshay, Hanson, Ivan, George, Augustine, Ashbrook, Michael, Blank, Nimrod, Abdelsalam, Murad, Sareen, Nishtha, Timmis, Steven B.H., O'Neill MD, William W.·2018·Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Abstract

Objective: The ‘Detroit Cardiogenic Shock Initiative’ is a single‐arm, multicenter study to assess the feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients who present with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: Between July 2016 and February 2017, 4 metro Detroit sites participated in the study. The centers agreed to treat patients with AMICS using a mutually agreed‐upon protocol emphasizing invasive hemodynamic monitoring and rapid initiation of MCS. Inclusion and exclusion criteria mimicked those from the ‘SHOCK’ trial with an additional exclusion criteria being use of intra‐aortic balloon pump counter pulsation prior to MCS. Results: A total of 41 consecutive patients were included. Patients had an average age of 65 ± 14 years, 71% were male and 59% of patients were admitted to the hospital in cardiogenic shock. Prior to receiving MCS, 93% of patients were on vasopressors or inotropes, 15% of patients had a witnessed out of hospital cardiac arrest, 27% of patients had an in‐hospital cardiac arrest, and 17% were under active cardiopulmonary resuscitation while MCS was being implanted. In accordance to the protocol recommendation, 66% of patients had a MCS device inserted prior to PCI. Right heart catheterization and hemodynamic monitoring was performed in 83% of patients. Door to support times averaged 83 ± 58 minutes and 71% of patients were able to reduce the levels of inotropes and vasopressors within the first 24‐hours of their index procedure. Pre‐procedure cardiac power output (CPO) was 0.57 W and post‐procedure CPO was 0.95 W, a 67% increase (p < 0.001). Survival to explant for the entire cohort was 85% a significant improvement from institutional historical controls (85% vs 51% p < 0.001) and survival to discharge was 76%. Conclusion: Centers who adopted a regional shock protocol emphasizing the delivery of early MCS with invasive hemodynamic monitoring can achieve rapid door to support times and can improve survival in patients who present with AMICS. Larger national studies will be needed to further validate this pilot feasibility study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ccd.27427

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Basir, M. B., Schreiber, T., Dixon, S., Alaswad, K., Patel, K., Almany, S., Khandelwal, A., Hanson, I., George, A., Ashbrook, M., Blank, N., Abdelsalam, M., Sareen, N., Timmis, S. B. H., & O'Neill MD, W. W.
Venue
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-20
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
454-461
ISSN
  • 1522-1946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-726X
OpenAlex
W2776816472
Cited by
238
References
0
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ccd.27427
The paper
Basir, M. B., Schreiber, T., Dixon, S., Alaswad, K., Patel, K., Almany, S., Khandelwal, A., Hanson, I., George, A., Ashbrook, M., Blank, N., Abdelsalam, M., Sareen, N., Timmis, S. B. H., & O'Neill MD, W. W. (2018). Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27427

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.