The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Catalytic Hydrocracking—Mechanisms and Versatility of the Process
Abstract
Hydrocracking of saturated hydrocarbons can proceed by means of four distinctly different mechanisms. On bifunctional catalysts comprising hydrogenation/dehydrogenation and Brønsted acid sites alkenes and carbocations occur as intermediates. The current mechanistic views of bifunctional hydrocracking of long‐chain n‐alkanes are discussed in detail with emphasis on the now widely accepted concept of ideal hydrocracking. Other mechanisms are hydrogenolysis and Haag–Dessau hydrocracking which proceed, respectively, on monofunctional metallic and acidic catalysts. Even without a catalyst, thermal hydrocracking occurs in chain reactions via radicals. The chemistry of hydrocracking naphthenes on bifunctional catalysts resembles that of alkanes. A peculiarity, however, is the pronounced reluctance of cyclic carbenium ions to undergo endocyclic β‐scissions. The effect manifests itself in the so‐called paring reaction, which, in turn, forms the basis for measuring the Spaciousness Index for characterizing the effective pore width of zeolitic catalysts. Hydrocracking on bifunctional catalysts is among the very important processes in modern petroleum refining. It is primarily used for converting heavy oils into diesel and jet fuel. Besides, hydrocracking is appreciated for its pronounced versatility: numerous process variants exist which help to meet specific requirements in refineries or petrochemical plants. Two recent developments are briefly discussed in this review, viz. the conversion of surplus aromatics, e.g., in pyrolysis gasoline, into a synthetic feedstock for steam crackers, and quality enhancement of diesel fuel by selective ring opening of polynuclear aromatics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dong, Z., Chen, W., Xu, K., Liu, Y., Wu, J., & Zhang, F. (2022) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.2c04915 · Cited by 269
Toward the Atomic Scale Simulation of Intricate Acidic Aluminosilicate Catalysts
Chizallet, C. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c01136 · Cited by 79
Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis Catalysts for Selective Production of Diesel Fraction
Mazurova, K., Miyassarova, A., Eliseev, O., Stytsenko, V., Glotov, A., & Stavitskaya, A. (2023) · Catalysts · doi:10.3390/catal13081215 · Cited by 28
Xiao, T., Shirvani, T., Inderwildi, O., Gonzalez-Cortes, S., AlMegren, H., King, D., & Edwards, P. P. (2015) · Topics in Catalysis · doi:10.1007/s11244-015-0401-1 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Weitkamp, J.
- Venue
- ChemCatChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 292-306
- ISSN
- 1867-3880 (ISSN-L)
- 1867-3899
- OpenAlex
- W1981977552
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catalytic Hydrocracking—Mechanisms and Versatility of the Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cctc.201100315
- The paper
- Weitkamp, J. (2012). Catalytic Hydrocracking—Mechanisms and Versatility of the Process. ChemCatChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201100315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.