Cited by 81Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionHydrogen Storage and MaterialsAmmonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction

Controlling the Morphology and Efficiency of Nanostructured Molybdenum Nitride Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Ojha, Kasinath, Saha, Soumen, Kumar, Bharat, Hazra, Kiran Shankar, Ganguli, Ashok K.·2016·ChemCatChem

Abstract

Among catalysts based on non‐noble metals, Mo‐based materials are important for hydrogen evolution because of their low cost, good conductivity, and catalytic efficiency. This study demonstrates a facile two‐step synthesis of Mo2N nanostructures assembled from 5–8 nm particles with graphitic carbon nitride as the nitrogen source. These Mo2N nanostructures of various morphologies (hexagons, triangles, and nanowires) show a very high activity and stability in acidic media during water electrolysis. Their nanostructures were characterized by using powder XRD, electron microscopy, N2 gas adsorption analysis, and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Hydrogen evolution reaction parameters, which include the Tafel slope, charge transfer resistance, and stability, were analyzed by using linear sweep voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Thin hexagonal sheets of Mo2N show the highest apparent electrocatalytic activity (current density of 197 mA cm−2geometric at −400 mV vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode) and excellent stability in an acidic medium with a small onset potential of 90 mV and a Tafel slope of 145 mV decade−1. The lowest Tafel slope was observed for Mo2N nanowires.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cctc.201501341

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ojha, K., Saha, S., Kumar, B., Hazra, K. S., & Ganguli, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
  • Institute of Nano Science and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Ganguli, Ashok K.
Venue
ChemCatChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-18
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
1218-1225
ISSN
  • 1867-3880 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-3899
OpenAlex
W2283941186
Cited by
81
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ChemCatChem (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Science & Technology
  • DST
  • Department of Electronics and Information Technology
  • CSIR, Govt. of India
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
Keywords
molybdenum nitride, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysts, graphitic carbon nitride, nitrogen source, two-step synthesis, nanowires, morphology control, acidic water electrolysis, Tafel slope, charge transfer resistance, catalyst stability, non-noble metal catalysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review