Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engineering UiO‐66 Metal Organic Framework for Heterogeneous Catalysis

Dhakshinamoorthy, Amarajothi, Santiago‐Portillo, Andrea, Asiri, Abdullah M., Garcia, Hermenegildo·2019·ChemCatChem

Abstract

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are currently attracting considerable attention as heterogeneous catalysts at moderate temperatures, mainly for liquid‐phase reactions. Since structural stability is one of the major concerns for the use of MOFs in catalysis, particularly considering that frequently some of the reported MOF materials are very unstable, the interest in this area has been focused on those MOFs exhibiting the highest structural robustness, UiO‐66 being among the most widely used. Two introductory sections deal with the synthesis, structure and main properties of UiO‐66, including its remarkable thermal (up to 350 °C) and chemical (aqueous solution in a wide pH range) stability. The main body of the review summarizes those examples of using UiO‐66 in catalysis grouped according to the nature of the active sites, starting with the use of UiO‐66 as Lewis acids. In this section, emphasis has been made in the recent strategies to create structural defects in a controlled way that generate Lewis acidity. Other sections cover examples illustrating substituted terephthalate as active sites and the evidence that there is a synergy between acid and basic sites in close proximity that make some of these UiO‐66 with substituents at the linker to act as dual acid‐base catalysts. Other sections are focused on the use of UiO‐66 as hosts of metal nanoparticles, metal oxides and other host, remarking the influence that the nature of UiO‐66 and the possible presence of substituents in the framework play on the activity of the incorporated guest. The last section summarizes the current state of the art in the use of UiO‐66 in catalysis and provides our views on future developments regarding the application of UiO‐66 in industrial processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cctc.201801452

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Metadata

Authors
Dhakshinamoorthy, A., Santiago‐Portillo, A., Asiri, A. M., & Garcia, H.
Venue
ChemCatChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-10
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
899-923
ISSN
  • 1867-3880 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-3899
OpenAlex
W2901994340
Cited by
298
References
88
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering UiO‐66 Metal Organic Framework for Heterogeneous Catalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cctc.201801452
The paper
Dhakshinamoorthy, A., Santiago‐Portillo, A., Asiri, A. M., & Garcia, H. (2019). Engineering UiO‐66 Metal Organic Framework for Heterogeneous Catalysis. ChemCatChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201801452

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.