Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Different Functional Groups on Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution in Covalent‐Organic Frameworks

Sheng, Jing‐Li, Dong, Hong, Meng, Xiang‐Bin, Tang, Hong‐Liang, Yao, Yu‐Hao, Liu, Dan‐Qing, Bai, Lin‐Lu, Zhang, Feng‐Ming, Wei, Jin‐Zhi, Sun, Xiao‐Jun·2019·ChemCatChem

Abstract

Covalent‐organic frameworks (COFs) have been recognized as a new type of promising photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. To investigate how different functional groups attached in the backbone of COFs affect the overall photocatalytic H 2 evolution, for the first time, we selected and synthesized a series of ketoenamine‐based COFs with the same host framework as model system. It includes TpPa−COF−X (X=−H, −(CH 3)2, and −NO 2) with three different groups attached in the backbone of TpPa−COF. We systematically investigated the differences in morphology, light‐absorption intensity and band gap of these 2D COFs. The results of photocatalytic H 2 evolution measurements indicate that the TpPa−COF−(CH 3)2 shows the best activity, while the activity of TpPa−COF−NO 2 is relatively low compared to that of other two COFs in the system. Moreover, the separation ability of photogenerated charge was also followed the order of TpPa−COF−(CH 3)2>TpPa−COF>TpPa−COF−NO 2. The best photocatalytic H 2 production performance of TpPa−COF−(CH 3)2 in these systems should be mainly attributed to the better electron‐donating ability of −CH 3 groups compared to −H or −NO 2 group, which result in more efficient charge transferring in the inner of the material. This work demonstrates that reasonably adding electron‐donating group in TpPa−COFs can lead to a better photocatalytic H 2 evolution activity, and which is meaningful for further design of efficient COF‐based photocatalysts for H 2 evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cctc.201900058

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Sheng, J., Dong, H., Meng, X., Tang, H., Yao, Y., Liu, D., Bai, L., Zhang, F., Wei, J., & Sun, X.
Venue
ChemCatChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-10
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
2313-2319
ISSN
  • 1867-3880 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-3899
OpenAlex
W2923333623
Cited by
210
References
2
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Different Functional Groups on Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution in Covalent‐Organic Frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cctc.201900058
The paper
Sheng, J., Dong, H., Meng, X., Tang, H., Yao, Y., Liu, D., Bai, L., Zhang, F., Wei, J., & Sun, X. (2019). Effect of Different Functional Groups on Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution in Covalent‐Organic Frameworks. ChemCatChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201900058

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.