Cited by 1Catalysis for Biomass ConversionCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Highly Selective Alkaline Oxide Promoted Ni/silica for the Production of Cyclohexanol/‐one from Lignin‐Derived Guaiacol

Open access
Kretzschmar, Nils, Busse, Oliver, Roslova, Maria, Hantusch, Martin, Seifert, Markus·2023·ChemCatChem

Abstract

Catalytic hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) is a promising route to upgrade bio‐oils from plants or pyrolysis to basic chemicals. KA‐oil (cyclohexanol/‐one) is an example of a highly valuable feedstock for the industrial synthesis of caprolactam and perlon, which can potentially be produced via a completely sustainable route. This work investigates the alkaline promoter effects on Ni‐based catalysts for the selective HDO of lignin surrogate guaiacol using mesoporous Ni/MgO and co‐impregnated Ni‐MgO/SiO 2 catalysts. Due to preferred demethoxylation by alkaline oxides and their accumulation on nickel corners, responsible for dehydration, conversion, and selectivity for KA‐oil rise. Furthermore, influences of operating parameters are investigated and optimized by design of experiments (DoE), while long‐term stability (24 h) and water resistance remain high. In a final proof of concept, the application of Ni‐CaO/SiO 2 was the most promising material (U=93 %, S=86 %), demonstrating a sustainable route from lignin‐based bio‐oil to produce a bulk commodity for caprolactam synthesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cctc.202300764

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 1

Authors
Kretzschmar, N., Busse, O., Roslova, M., Hantusch, M., & Seifert, M.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Seifert, Markus
Venue
ChemCatChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-17
Volume
15
Issue
18
ISSN
  • 1867-3880 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-3899
OpenAlex
W4385065292
Cited by
1
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ChemCatChem (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Graduiertenakademie, Technische Universität Dresden
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SE2450-/2-1 (no. 507997100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
catalytic hydrodeoxygenation, guaiacol, KA oil, nickel catalysts, lignin-derived bio-oil, demethoxylation, caprolactam synthesis, mesoporous catalysts, catalyst stability, water resistance, process optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review