CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Call for Radical Reflexivity in Counseling Qualitative Research

Smith, Elyssa B., Luke, Melissa M.·2021·Counselor Education and Supervision
DOI 10.1002/ceas.12201
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this article, we provide an interdisciplinary overview of reflexive practice within qualitative research and discuss dominant views on reflexivity within qualitative counseling literature. We propose a new way to frame the reflexive process called radical reflexivity. Finally, we offer examples from our research experience and discuss implications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ceas.12201

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1002/ceas.12024 · DOI
  2. Denzin N. K., 2018, The SAGE handbook of qualitative research
  3. 10.1002/johc.12047 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/ceas.12123 · DOI
  5. Freda M. F., 2017, Promoting reflection and reflexivity through narrative devices: Narrative mediation path qualitative multimodal method, Qualitative Research Journal, 17, 2
  6. 10.1080/01933921003705966 · DOI
  7. 10.34296/01011003 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0261927X15575577 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00091.x · DOI
  10. Hrovat A., 2016, Is the personal theoretical? A critical incident analysis of student theory journals, The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 8
  11. 10.1080/01933922.2018.1484539 · DOI
  12. Luepnitz D., 2002, Schopenhauer's porcupines: Intimacy and its dilemmas: Five stories of psychotherapy
  13. 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2011.tb01919.x · DOI
  14. 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2010.tb00108.x · DOI
  15. 10.1080/23727810.2017.1313629 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/1077800417704469 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/0951839032000060635 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/1077800414563803 · DOI
  19. Smith E., 2018, Why should we care? Psychodynamic theory and practice in counselor preparation, The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 11
  20. 10.1002/johc.12120 · DOI
  21. Smith E. B., 2019, Poetry as reflexivity: (Post) reflexive poetic composition, Qualitative Inquiry, 26, 1
  22. Smith E. B.(2019c).Therapists' experiences of the internalization process in counseling and psychotherapy: A post‐intentional phenomenological investigation[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Wyoming.
  23. St. Pierre E. A., 2011, The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 611
  24. 10.1080/09518398.2013.788754 · DOI
  25. St. Pierre E. A., 2015, Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research, 75
  26. 10.1080/09518398.2017.1336806 · DOI
  27. 10.4324/9781315173474 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Smith, E. B., & Luke, M. M.
Affiliations
  • School of Social & Behavioral Sciences Stockton University
  • Department of Counseling and Human Services Syracuse University
Venue
Counselor Education and Supervision
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
164-172
ISSN
  • 0011-0035
  • 1556-6978
DOI
10.1002/ceas.12201
Cited by
29
References
1
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Call for Radical Reflexivity in Counseling Qualitative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ceas.12201
The paper
Smith, E. B., & Luke, M. M. (2021). A Call for Radical Reflexivity in Counseling Qualitative Research. Counselor Education and Supervision. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12201