The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Novel Process Windows – Gate to Maximizing Process Intensification via Flow Chemistry
Abstract
Driven by the economics of scale, the size of reaction vessels as the major processing apparatus of the chemical industry has became bigger and bigger [1, 2]. Consequently, the efforts for ensuring mixing and heat transfer have also increased, as these are scale dependent. This has brought vessel operation to (partly severe) technical limits, especially when controlling harsh conditions, e.g., due to large heat releases. Accordingly, processing at a very large scale has resulted in taming of the chemistry involved in order to slow it down to a technically controllable level. Therefore, reaction paths that already turned out too aggressive at the laboratory scale are automatically excluded for later scale‐up, which constitutes a common everyday confinement in exploiting chemical transformations. Organic chemists are barely conscious that even the small‐scale laboratory protocols in their textbooks contain many slow, disciplined chemical reactions. Operations such as adding a reactant drop by drop in a large diluted solvent volume have become second nature, but are not intrinsic to the good engineering of chemical reactions. These are intrinsic to the chemical apparatus used in the past. In contrast, today's process intensification [3–12] and the new flow‐chemistry reactors on the micro‐ and milli‐scale [13–39] allow such limitations to be overcome, and thus, enable a complete, ab‐initio type rethinking of the processes themselves. In this way, space‐time yields and the productivity of the reactor can be increased by orders of magnitude and other dramatic performance step changes can be achieved. A hand‐in‐hand design of the reactors and process re‐thinking is required to enable chemistry rather than subduing chemistry around the reactor [40]. This often leads to making use of process conditions far from conventional practice, under harsh environments, a procedure named here as Novel Process Windows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Flow Chemistry
Plutschack, M. B., Pieber, B., Gilmore, K., & Seeberger, P. H. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183 · Cited by 1,995
Continuous flow reactors: a perspective
Wiles, C., & Watts, P. (2012) · Green Chem. · doi:10.1039/c1gc16022b · Cited by 626
Kralisch, D., Ott, D., & Gericke, D. (2015) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c4gc01153h · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Hessel, V.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering & Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-29
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1655-1681
- ISSN
- 0930-7516 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4125
- OpenAlex
- W2142495898
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel Process Windows – Gate to Maximizing Process Intensification via Flow Chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ceat.200900474
- The paper
- Hessel, V. (2009). Novel Process Windows – Gate to Maximizing Process Intensification via Flow Chemistry. Chemical Engineering & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200900474
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.