Cited by 14Crystallization and Solubility StudiesCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

Modeling of Mixing‐Precipitation Processes: Agglomeration

Open access
Orlewski, Pawel M., Mazzotti, Marco·2020·Chemical Engineering & Technology

Abstract

A comprehensive description of the barium sulfate precipitation process in a wide range of supersaturations is presented. By using an additive to stabilize the particles, the decoupling of the primary from the secondary processes, as well as the agglomeration from aggregation was possible. By being able to study the two processes independently, a model describing the agglomeration of barium sulfate in the range of high supersaturations was validated experimentally for the first time. The proposed model has proven to describe the experiments with a high degree of accuracy in the whole range of supersaturations investigated. Additionally, by comparing agglomeration kernels of various complexity, ranges where simplifications are possible were identified, thus enabling the future development of models with better performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ceat.201900551

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heterogeneous nucleation parameters reflect what is known in literature; its rate has lower slope, lower exponential factor, and pre-exponential factor orders of magnitude lower.

    “Heterogeneous nucleation parameters reflect what is known in the literature. In this regard, its rate is supposed to have a lower slope, which is translated into a lower exponential factor,22 (i.e., the lower interfacial tension between the nucleation sites and the solution) and the pre-exponential factor to be orders of magnitude lower.”

    From Computational Modeling of Magnesium Hydroxide Precipitation and Kinetics Parameters Identification (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

    In “Primary Processes Revisited > Nucleation” (page unavailable), the paper defines the heterogeneous parameters as Ahet = aAhom and Bhet = bBhom, with fitted values a = 3 × 10⁻²¹ and b = 0.001. These support a much smaller pre-exponential factor and exponential parameter for the studied system. The paper does not establish that the smaller heterogeneous parameter represents lower interfacial tension between nucleation sites and the solution; it says a theoretical derivation of those parameters is not possible here. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Analogous behavior was found for a similar geometry (Y-mixer) with similar operating conditions.

    “Analogous behavior was found for a similar geometry (Y-mixer) with similar operating conditions.22”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]L. Vicum, M. Mazzotti, J. Baldyga, Chem. Eng. Technol. 2003, 26 (3), 325– 333. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200390050 · DOI
  2. [2]A. Mersmann, Crystallization Technology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 2001.
  3. [3]J. Bałdyga, M. Jasińska, W. Orciuch, Chem. Eng. Technol. 2003, 26 (3), 334– 340. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200390051 · DOI
  4. [4]D. L. Marchisio, A. A. Barresi, M. Garbero, AIChE J. 2002, 48 (9), 2039– 2050. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690480917 · DOI
  5. [5]A. E. Nielsen, Acta Chem. Scand. 1961, 15, 441– 442.
  6. [6]D. Kashchiev, G. M. van Rosmalen, Cryst. Res. Technol. 2003, 38 (78), 555– 574. DOI: 10.1002/crat.200310070 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [7]R. Mohanty, S. Bhandarkar, B. Zuromski, R. Brown, J. Estrin, AIChE J. 1988, 34 (12), 2063– 2068. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690341216 · DOI
  8. [8]R. T. Kügler, S. Doyle, M. Kind, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 133, 140– 147.DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.12.024 · DOI
  9. [9]H. C. Schwarzer, W. Peukert, AIChE J. 2004, 50 (12), 3234– 3247. DOI: 10.1002/aic.10277 · DOI
  10. [10]A. E. Nielsen, J. M. Toft, J. Cryst. Growth 1984, 67 (2), 278– 288. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(84)90188-X · DOI
  11. [11]From Molecules to Crystallizer (Eds: Davey R., Garside J.), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000.
  12. [12]J. Bałdyga, W. Podgórska, R. Pohorecki, Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50 (8), 1281– 1300. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(95)98841-2 · DOI
  13. [14]S. Nagata, Mixing: Principles and Applications, Halsted Press, Sydney 1975.
  14. [16]P. M. Armenante, D. J. Kirwan, Chem. Eng. Sci. 1989, 44 (12), 2781– 2796. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(89)85088-2 · DOI
  15. [17]C. Lindenberg, M. Mazzotti, AIChE J. 2011, 57 (4), 942– 950. DOI: 10.1002/aic.12326 · DOI
  16. [18]D. Ilievski, I. Livk, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61 (6), 2010– 2022. DOI: 10.1016/J.CES.2005.10.051 · DOI
  17. [19]M. Hounslow, H. Mumtaz, A. Collier, J. P. Barrick, A. Bramley, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56 (7), 2543– 2552. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00436-X · DOI
  18. [20]C. D. Rielly, A. J. Marquis, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56 (7), 2475– 2493. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00457-7 · DOI
  19. [21]C. Lindenberg, J. Schöll, L. Vicum, M. Mazzotti, J. Brozio, Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 8 (1), 224– 237. DOI: 10.1021/cg070161f · DOI
  20. [22]P. G. Saffman, J. S. Turner, J. Fluid Mech. 1956, 1 (1), 16 DOI: 10.1017/S0022112056000020 · DOI
  21. [23]M. von Smoluchowski, Z. Phys. Chem. 1917, 92, 129– 168.
  22. [24]N. Fuchs, Z. Phys. 1934, 89 (11–12), 736– 743. DOI: 10.1007/BF01341386 · DOI
  23. [25]H. C. Hamaker, Physica 1937, 4 (10), 1058– 1072. DOI: 10.1016/S0031-8914(37)80203-7 · DOI
  24. [26]J. Visser, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1972, 3 (4), 331– 363. DOI: 10.1016/0001-8686(72)85001-2 · DOI
  25. [27]J. N. Israelachvili, Intermol. Surf. Forces 2011, 291– 340. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375182-9.10014-4 · DOI
  26. [28]H.‐C. Schwarzer, W. Peukert, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60 (1), 11– 25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.06.050 · DOI
  27. [29]V. Gallardo, L. Zurita, A. Ontiveros, J. D. G. Durán, J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 89 (9), 1134– 1142. DOI: 10.1002/1520-6017(200009)89:9<1134::AID-JPS5>3.0.CO;2-D 10944378 · DOI
  28. [30]N. Gavish, K. Promislow, Phys. Rev. E 2016, 94, 12611 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.012611 27575183 · DOI
  29. [31]L. A. Spielman, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1970, 33 (4), 562– 571. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(70)90008-1 · DOI
  30. [33]S. Melis, M. Verduyn, G. Storti, M. Morbidelli, J. Bałdyga, AIChE J. 1999, 45 (7), 1383– 1393. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690450703 · DOI
  31. [34]S. Kumar, D. Ramkrishna, Chem. Eng. Sci. 1997, 52 (24), 4659– 4679. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00307-2 · DOI
  32. [35]H.‐C. Schwarzer, W. Peukert, Chem. Eng. Commun. 2004, 191 (4), 580– 606. DOI: 10.1080/00986440490270106 · DOI
  33. [36]A. Petrova, W. Hintz, J. Tomas, Chem. Eng. Technol. 2008, 31 (4), 604– 608. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200700471 · DOI
  34. [37]M. Pieper, S. Aman, J. Tomas, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 77, 228– 234. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.12.043 · DOI
  35. [38]H.‐C. Schwarzer, F. Schwertfirm, M. Manhart, H.‐J. Schmid, W. Peukert, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61 (1), 167– 181. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.064 · DOI
  36. [39]L. Vicum, S. Ottiger, M. Mazzotti, Ł. Makowski, J. Bałdyga, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2004, 59 (8–9), 1767– 1781. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.01.032 · DOI
  37. [40]W. Podgórska, Ph. D. Thesis, Warsaw University of Technology, 1993.

Authors
Orlewski, P. M., & Mazzotti, M.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Mazzotti, Marco
Venue
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-20
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
1029-1039
ISSN
  • 0930-7516 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4125
OpenAlex
W2996153717
Cited by
14
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Engineering & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
  • BASF
  • Horizon 2020 (2‐73959‐18)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Keywords
barium sulfate precipitation, agglomeration, supersaturation, primary nucleation, secondary nucleation, aggregation, agglomeration kernel, precipitation simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review