The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partial least squares analysis with cross‐validation for the two‐class problem: A Monte Carlo study
Abstract
A method for statistical analysis of two independent samples with respect to difference in location is investigated. The method uses the partial least squares projections to latent structures (PLS) with cross‐validation. The relation to classical methods is discussed and a Monte Carlo study is performed to describe how the distribution of the test‐statistic employed depends on the number of objects, the number of variables, the percentage variance explained by the first PLS‐component and the percentage missing values. Polynomial approximations for the dependency of the 50 per cent and the 5 per cent levels of the test‐statistic on these factors are given. The polynomial for the 50 per cent level is complicated, involving several first‐, second‐ and third‐degree terms, whereas the polynomial for the 5 per cent level is dependent only on the number of objects and the size of the first component. A separate Monte Carlo experiment indicates that a moderate difference in sample size does not affect the distribution of the test‐statistic. The multi‐sample location problem is also studied and the effect of increasing the number of samples on the test‐statistic is shown in simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications
Geisser, S. (1975) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865 · Cited by 2,748
The multivariate calibration problem in chemistry solved by the PLS method
Wold, S., Martens, H., & Wold, H. (1983) · Lecture notes in mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0062108 · Cited by 1,185
Self-citation
Cited by
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
Self-citationSupport Vector Machines for classification and regression
Brereton, R. G., & Lloyd, G. R. (2010) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/b918972f · Cited by 1,036
Trends in Chemometrics: Food Authentication, Microbiology, and Effects of Processing
Granato, D., Putnik, P., Kovačević, D. B., Santos, J. S., Calado, V., Rocha, R. S., Cruz, A. G. D., Jarvis, B., Rodionova, O. Y., & Pomerantsev, A. (2018) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12341 · Cited by 440
Ruiz-Perez, D., Guan, H., Madhivanan, P., Mathee, K., & Narasimhan, G. (2020) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3310-7 · Cited by 426
CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project
Mansouri, K., Abdelaziz, A., Rybacka, A., Roncaglioni, A., Tropsha, A., Varnek, A., Zakharov, A., Worth, A., Richard, A. M., Grulke, C. M., et al. (2016) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1510267 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Ståhle, L., & Wold, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemometrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-196
- ISSN
- 0886-9383 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-128X
- OpenAlex
- W2169016202
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partial least squares analysis with cross‐validation for the two‐class problem: A Monte Carlo study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cem.1180010306
- The paper
- Ståhle, L., & Wold, S. (1987). Partial least squares analysis with cross‐validation for the two‐class problem: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Chemometrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1180010306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.