Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Study on the Phase Behaviors, Viscosities, and Thermodynamic Properties of CO2/[C4mim][PF6]/Methanol System at Elevated Pressures

Liu, Zhimin, Wu, Weize, Han, Buxing, Dong, Zexuan, Zhao, Guoying, Wang, Jiaqiu, Jiang, Tao, Yang, Guanying·2003·Chemistry – A European Journal

Abstract

An apparatus to determine the vapor–liquid equilibria of CO 2/ionic liquid (IL)/organic solvent multisystems and the viscosity of the liquid phase at elevated pressures has been constructed. The solubility of CO 2 in 3‐butyl‐1‐methyl‐imidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([C 4 mim][PF 6]) and the viscosity of CO 2‐saturated [C 4 mim][PF 6] have been studied at 313.15, 323.15, and 333.15 K and at pressures up to 12.5 MPa. The phase behavior of CO 2/[C 4 mim][PF 6]/methanol ternary mixture and the viscosity of the liquid phases at equilibrium condition have also been determined at 313.15 K and at 7.15 and 10.00 MPa. The partition coefficients of the components in the ternary system are calculated. Peng–Robinson equation of state and some thermodynamic functions are combined to calculate the fugacity coefficients of the components in the system. It demonstrates that the viscosity of the IL‐rich phase decreases significantly with increasing pressure of CO 2, and the effect of temperature on the viscosity of CO 2/IL mixture is not noticeable at high pressure, although the viscosity of the CO 2‐free IL decreases dramatically with increasing temperature. Compressed CO 2 may become an attractive reagent for reducing the viscosity of ILs in many applications. The mole fraction of methanol in the CO 2‐rich phase is much lower than that in the IL‐rich phase; this indicates that the interaction between the IL and methanol is stronger than that between CO 2 and methanol. The fugacity coefficient of CO 2 in IL‐rich phase is larger than unity, while that of methanol is much small than unity, which further suggests that methanol–IL interaction is much stronger than CO 2–IL interaction. However, the CO 2–IL interaction is stronger than the CO 2–methanol interaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/chem.200204647

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Z., Wu, W., Han, B., Dong, Z., Zhao, G., Wang, J., Jiang, T., & Yang, G.
Venue
Chemistry – A European Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08-07
Volume
9
Issue
16
Pages
3897-3903
ISSN
  • 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3765
OpenAlex
W1998022382
Cited by
166
References
1
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study on the Phase Behaviors, Viscosities, and Thermodynamic Properties of CO2/[C4mim][PF6]/Methanol System at Elevated Pressures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.200204647
The paper
Liu, Z., Wu, W., Han, B., Dong, Z., Zhao, G., Wang, J., Jiang, T., & Yang, G. (2003). Study on the Phase Behaviors, Viscosities, and Thermodynamic Properties of CO2/[C4mim][PF6]/Methanol System at Elevated Pressures. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200204647

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.