Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aldol Condensations Over Reconstructed Mg–Al Hydrotalcites: Structure–Activity Relationships Related to the Rehydration Method

Abelló, Sònia, Medina, Francesc, Tichit, Didier, Pérez‐Ramírez, Javier, Groen, Johan C., Sueiras, Jesús E., Salagre, Pilar, Cesteros, Yolanda·2005·Chemistry – A European Journal

Abstract

Two different rehydration procedures in the liquid or gas phase have been applied to reconstruct mixed oxides derived from calcined hydrotalcite‐like materials to be used as catalysts for aldol condensation reactions. The as‐synthesized hydrotalcite, its decomposition product, as well as the reconstructed solids upon rehydration were characterized by XRD, N 2 adsorption, He pycnometry, FTIR, SEM, TEM, 27 Al MAS‐NMR and CO 2‐TPD (TPD=temperature‐programmed desorption). Compared to the Mg–Al mixed oxide rehydrated in the gas phase (HT‐rg), that rehydrated in the liquid phase (HT‐rl) exhibits a superior catalytic performance with respect to the aldol condensation of citral with ketones to yield pseudoionones and in the self‐aldolization of acetone. The textural properties of HT‐rl and HT‐rg differ strongly and determine the catalytic behavior. A memory effect led to a higher degree of reconstruction of the lamellar structure when the mixed oxide was rehydrated in the gas phase rather than in the liquid phase, although liquid‐phase rehydration under fast stirring produced a surface area that was 26 times greater. This contrasts to typical statements in the literature claiming a higher degree of reconstruction in the presence of large amounts of water in the medium. CO 2‐TPD shows that the number of OH− groups and their nature are very similar in HT‐rg and HT‐rl, and cannot explain the markedly different catalytic behavior. Accordingly, only a small fraction of the available basic sites in the rehydrated samples is active in liquid‐phase aldol condensations. Our results support the model in which only basic sites near the edges of the hydrotalcite platelets are partaking in aldol reactions. Based on this, reconstructed materials with small crystallites (produced by exfoliation during mechanical stirring), that is, possessing a high external surface area, are beneficial in the reactions compared to larger crystals with a high degree of intraplatelet porosity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/chem.200400409

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Abelló, S., Medina, F., Tichit, D., Pérez‐Ramírez, J., Groen, J. C., Sueiras, J. E., Salagre, P., & Cesteros, Y.
Venue
Chemistry – A European Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12-29
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
728-739
ISSN
  • 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3765
OpenAlex
W2094975043
Cited by
255
References
20
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aldol Condensations Over Reconstructed Mg–Al Hydrotalcites: Structure–Activity Relationships Related to the Rehydration Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.200400409
The paper
Abelló, S., Medina, F., Tichit, D., Pérez‐Ramírez, J., Groen, J. C., Sueiras, J. E., Salagre, P., & Cesteros, Y. (2005). Aldol Condensations Over Reconstructed Mg–Al Hydrotalcites: Structure–Activity Relationships Related to the Rehydration Method. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200400409

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.