The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supramolecular Chemistry at Interfaces: Molecular Recognition on Nanopatterned Porous Surfaces
Abstract
Through the illustration of key examples that have recently appeared in the literature, the intention of this review is to provide a perspective of current advances on the molecular recognition at the interfaces aimed at the engineering of multifunctional organic‐based materials. The great interest in such systems has been motivated by the need to fabricate smaller and smaller components in order to improve, for example, the information storage capabilities of classical silicon‐based devices. Although great progress has been achieved on the exploitation of “top‐down” approaches, strong hope is now put on the development of hybrid devices in which the elementary components are replaced with single organic molecules. Nevertheless, the drive towards such devices is restricted by both their stability and difficulties to precisely control and manipulate the structural organisation at the molecular level. To overcome these restrictions, the use of nanotemplated surfaces featuring porous domains in which responsive functional molecules can be precisely accommodated at the single‐molecule level is one of the most promising approaches. In the first part of this manuscript, we therefore illustrate the main engineering strategies [1) through non‐covalent interactions, 2) surface‐confined covalent reactions and 3) assembly of pre‐organised cavities such as synthetic macrocycles] currently in use to create two‐dimensional (2D) patterned surfaces displaying porous structures at the nanoscale level. Such networks, featuring periodic hollow domains (controllable both in shape and size), are of particular significance as their cavities can be used as receptors for the recognition of remotely controllable functional molecules. In the second part, the confinement of molecular guests within the cavities is discussed, emphasising the selectivity and dynamics of key assemblies, with a particular focus on the biomolecular recognition and post‐assembly covalent functionalisation, which could provide the opportunity to fabricate devices currently beyond our reach on an unprecedented precision and efficiency. All the examples will be discussed in terms of structural organisation as studied by scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals
Winfree, E., Liu, F., Wenzler, L. A., & Seeman, N. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28998 · Cited by 2,857
Cited by
Development of Structural Complexity by Liquid‐Crystal Self‐assembly
Tschierske, C. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201300872 · Cited by 631
Functional behaviour from controlled self-assembly: challenges and prospects
Ward, M. D., & Raithby, P. R. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35123d · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonifazi, D., Mohnani, S., & Llanes‐Pallas, A.
- Venue
- Chemistry – A European Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-13
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 7004-7025
- ISSN
- 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3765
- OpenAlex
- W2007340946
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supramolecular Chemistry at Interfaces: Molecular Recognition on Nanopatterned Porous Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.200900900
- The paper
- Bonifazi, D., Mohnani, S., & Llanes‐Pallas, A. (2009). Supramolecular Chemistry at Interfaces: Molecular Recognition on Nanopatterned Porous Surfaces. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200900900
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.