The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Roadmap to Implementing Metal–Organic Frameworks in Electronic Devices: Challenges and Critical Directions
Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and related material classes are attracting considerable attention for applications such as gas storage, separations, and catalysis. In contrast, research focused on potential uses in electronic devices is in its infancy. Several sensing concepts in which the tailorable chemistry of MOFs is used to enhance sensitivity or provide chemical specificity have been demonstrated, but in only a few cases are MOFs an integral part of an actual device. The synthesis of a few electrically conducting MOFs and their known structural flexibility suggest that MOF‐based electronic devices exploiting these properties could be constructed. It is clear, however, that new fabrication methods are required to take advantage of the unique properties of MOFs and extend their use to the realms of electronic circuitry. In this Concepts article, we describe the basic functional elements needed to fabricate electronic devices and summarize the current state of relevant MOF research, and then review recent work in which MOFs serve as active components in electronic devices. Finally, we propose a high‐level roadmap for device‐related MOF research, the objective of which is to stimulate thinking within the MOF community concerning the development these materials for applications including sensing, photonics, and microelectronics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Tan, J. C., & Cheetham, A. K. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00163e · Cited by 762
Density Functional Theory: A Practical Introduction
Sholl, D. S., & Steckel, J. A. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470447710 · Cited by 688
Tan, J. C., Bennett, T. D., & Cheetham, A. K. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003205107 · Cited by 552
Cited by
Electrically Conductive Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks
Sun, L., Campbell, M. G., & Dincă, M. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201506219 · Cited by 1,901
Metal–organic frameworks for energy storage: Batteries and supercapacitors
Wang, L., Han, Y., Feng, X., Zhou, J., Qi, P., & Wang, B. (2016) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2015.09.002 · Cited by 1,298
Jahan, M., Liu, Z., & Loh, K. P. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201300510 · Cited by 1,016
Metal organic frameworks for electrochemical applications
Morozan, A., & Jaouen, F. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22989g · Cited by 870
Huang, X., Sheng, P., Tu, Z., Zhang, F., Wang, J., Geng, H., Zou, Y., Di, C.-A., Yi, Y., Sun, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8408 · Cited by 855
Metadata
- Authors
- Allendorf, M. D., Schwartzberg, A., Stavila, V., & Talin, A. A.
- Venue
- Chemistry – A European Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09-20
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 11372-11388
- ISSN
- 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3765
- OpenAlex
- W2136855615
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Roadmap to Implementing Metal–Organic Frameworks in Electronic Devices: Challenges and Critical Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.201101595
- The paper
- Allendorf, M. D., Schwartzberg, A., Stavila, V., & Talin, A. A. (2011). A Roadmap to Implementing Metal–Organic Frameworks in Electronic Devices: Challenges and Critical Directions. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201101595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.