The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructing Organic D–A–π‐A‐Featured Sensitizers with a Quinoxaline Unit for High‐Efficiency Solar Cells: The Effect of an Auxiliary Acceptor on the Absorption and the Energy Level Alignment
Abstract
Four organic D–A–π‐A‐featured sensitizers (TQ1, TQ2, IQ1, and IQ2) have been studied for high‐efficiency dye‐sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). We employed an indoline or a triphenylamine unit as the donor, cyanoacetic acid as the acceptor/anchor, and a thiophene moiety as the conjugation bridge. Additionally, an electron‐withdrawing quinoxaline unit was incorporated between the donor and the π‐conjugation unit. These sensitizers show an additional absorption band covering the broad visible range in solution. The contribution from the incorporated quinoxaline was investigated theoretically by using DFT and time‐dependent DFT. The incorporated low‐band‐gap quinoxaline unit as an auxiliary acceptor has several merits, such as decreasing the band gap, optimizing the energy levels, and realizing a facile structural modification on several positions in the quinoxaline unit. As demonstrated, the observed additional absorption band is favorable to the photon‐to‐electron conversion because it corresponds to the efficient electron transitions to the LUMO orbital. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) Bode plots reveal that the replacement of a methoxy group with an octyloxy group can increase the injection electron lifetime by a factor of 2.4. IQ2 and TQ2 can perform well without any co‐adsorbent, successfully suppress the charge recombination from TiO 2 conduction band to I 3− in the electrolyte, and enhance the electron lifetime, resulting in a decreased dark current and enhanced open circuit voltage (Voc) values. By using a liquid electrolyte, DSSCs based on dye IQ2 exhibited a broad incident photon‐to‐current conversion efficiency (IPCE) action spectrum and high efficiency (η=8.50 %) with a short circuit current density (Jsc) of 15.65 mA cm−2, a Voc value of 776 mV, a fill factor (FF) of 0.70 under AM 1.5 illumination (100 mW cm−2). Moreover, the overall efficiency remained at 97 % of the initial value after 1000 h of visible‐light soaking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Influence of the Donor Size in D−π–A Organic Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Yang, J., Ganesan, P., Teuscher, J., Moehl, T., Kim, Y. J., Yi, C., Comte, P., Pei, K., Holcombe, T. W., Nazeeruddin, M. K., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja500280r · Cited by 458
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pei, K., Wu, Y., Wu, W., Zhang, Q., Chen, B., Tian, H., & Zhu, W.
- Venue
- Chemistry – A European Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-21
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 8190-8200
- ISSN
- 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3765
- OpenAlex
- W2036978006
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constructing Organic D–A–π‐A‐Featured Sensitizers with a Quinoxaline Unit for High‐Efficiency Solar Cells: The Effect of an Auxiliary Acceptor on the Absorption and the Energy Level Alignment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.201103542
- The paper
- Pei, K., Wu, Y., Wu, W., Zhang, Q., Chen, B., Tian, H., & Zhu, W. (2012). Constructing Organic D–A–π‐A‐Featured Sensitizers with a Quinoxaline Unit for High‐Efficiency Solar Cells: The Effect of an Auxiliary Acceptor on the Absorption and the Energy Level Alignment. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201103542
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.