The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of Interpenetration and Gas‐Sorption Properties of Metal–Organic Frameworks by a Simple Change in Ligand Design
Abstract
In metal–organic framework (MOF) chemistry, interpenetration greatly affects the gas‐sorption properties. However, there is a lack of a systematic study on how to control the interpenetration and whether the interpenetration enhances gas uptake capacities or not. Herein, we report an example of interpenetration that is simply controlled by the presence of a carbon–carbon double or single bond in identical organic building blocks, and provide a comparison of gas‐sorption properties for these similar frameworks, which differ only in their degree of interpenetration. Noninterpenetrated (SNU‐70) and doubly interpenetrated (SNU‐71) cubic nets were prepared by a solvothermal reaction of [Zn(NO 3)2]⋅6 H 2 O in N,N‐diethylformamide (DEF) with 4‐(2‐carboxyvinyl)benzoic acid and 4‐(2‐carboxyethyl)benzoic acid, respectively. They have almost‐identical structures, but the noninterpenetrated framework has a much bigger pore size (ca. 9.0×9.0 Å) than the interpenetrated framework (ca. 2.5×2.5 Å). Activation of the MOFs by using supercritical CO 2 gave SNU‐70′ and SNU‐71′. The simulation of the PXRD pattern of SNU‐71′ indicates the rearrangement of the interpenetrated networks on guest removal, which increases pore size. SNU‐70′ has a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of 5290 m 2 g−1, which is the highest value reported to date for a MOF with a cubic‐net structure, whereas SNU‐71′ has a BET surface area of 1770 m 2 g−1. In general, noninterpenetrated SNU‐70′ exhibits much higher gas‐adsorption capacities than interpenetrated SNU‐71′ at high pressures, regardless of the temperature. However, at P<1 atm, the gas‐adsorption capacities for N 2 at 77 K and CO 2 at 195 K are higher for noninterpenetrated SNU‐70′ than for interpenetrated SNU‐71′, but the capacities for H 2 and CH 4 are the opposite; SNU‐71′ has higher uptake capacities than SNU‐70′ due to the higher isosteric heat of gas adsorption that results from the smaller pores. In particular, SNU‐70′ has exceptionally high H 2 and CO 2 uptake capacities. By using a post‐synthetic method, the CC double bond in SNU‐70 was quantitatively brominated at room temperature, and the MOF still showed very high porosity (BET surface area of 2285 m 2 g−1).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Cited by
Activation of metal–organic framework materials
Mondloch, J. E., Karagiaridi, O., Farha, O. K., & Hupp, J. T. (2013) · CrystEngComm · doi:10.1039/c3ce41232f · Cited by 324
Coordination polymers and metal–organic frameworks based on poly(pyrazole)-containing ligands
Pettinari, C., Tăbăcaru, A., & Galli, S. (2016) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2015.08.005 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Prasad, T. K., & Suh, M. P.
- Venue
- Chemistry – A European Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 8673-8680
- ISSN
- 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3765
- OpenAlex
- W2099381988
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of Interpenetration and Gas‐Sorption Properties of Metal–Organic Frameworks by a Simple Change in Ligand Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.201200456
- The paper
- Prasad, T. K., & Suh, M. P. (2012). Control of Interpenetration and Gas‐Sorption Properties of Metal–Organic Frameworks by a Simple Change in Ligand Design. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201200456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.