Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Control of Interpenetration and Gas‐Sorption Properties of Metal–Organic Frameworks by a Simple Change in Ligand Design

Prasad, Thazhe Kootteri, Suh, Myunghyun Paik·2012·Chemistry – A European Journal

Abstract

In metal–organic framework (MOF) chemistry, interpenetration greatly affects the gas‐sorption properties. However, there is a lack of a systematic study on how to control the interpenetration and whether the interpenetration enhances gas uptake capacities or not. Herein, we report an example of interpenetration that is simply controlled by the presence of a carbon–carbon double or single bond in identical organic building blocks, and provide a comparison of gas‐sorption properties for these similar frameworks, which differ only in their degree of interpenetration. Noninterpenetrated (SNU‐70) and doubly interpenetrated (SNU‐71) cubic nets were prepared by a solvothermal reaction of [Zn(NO 3)2]⋅6 H 2 O in N,N‐diethylformamide (DEF) with 4‐(2‐carboxyvinyl)benzoic acid and 4‐(2‐carboxyethyl)benzoic acid, respectively. They have almost‐identical structures, but the noninterpenetrated framework has a much bigger pore size (ca. 9.0×9.0 Å) than the interpenetrated framework (ca. 2.5×2.5 Å). Activation of the MOFs by using supercritical CO 2 gave SNU‐70′ and SNU‐71′. The simulation of the PXRD pattern of SNU‐71′ indicates the rearrangement of the interpenetrated networks on guest removal, which increases pore size. SNU‐70′ has a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of 5290 m 2 g−1, which is the highest value reported to date for a MOF with a cubic‐net structure, whereas SNU‐71′ has a BET surface area of 1770 m 2 g−1. In general, noninterpenetrated SNU‐70′ exhibits much higher gas‐adsorption capacities than interpenetrated SNU‐71′ at high pressures, regardless of the temperature. However, at P<1 atm, the gas‐adsorption capacities for N 2 at 77 K and CO 2 at 195 K are higher for noninterpenetrated SNU‐70′ than for interpenetrated SNU‐71′, but the capacities for H 2 and CH 4 are the opposite; SNU‐71′ has higher uptake capacities than SNU‐70′ due to the higher isosteric heat of gas adsorption that results from the smaller pores. In particular, SNU‐70′ has exceptionally high H 2 and CO 2 uptake capacities. By using a post‐synthetic method, the CC double bond in SNU‐70 was quantitatively brominated at room temperature, and the MOF still showed very high porosity (BET surface area of 2285 m 2 g−1).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/chem.201200456

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Prasad, T. K., & Suh, M. P.
Venue
Chemistry – A European Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-08
Volume
18
Issue
28
Pages
8673-8680
ISSN
  • 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3765
OpenAlex
W2099381988
Cited by
166
References
1
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of Interpenetration and Gas‐Sorption Properties of Metal–Organic Frameworks by a Simple Change in Ligand Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.201200456
The paper
Prasad, T. K., & Suh, M. P. (2012). Control of Interpenetration and Gas‐Sorption Properties of Metal–Organic Frameworks by a Simple Change in Ligand Design. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201200456

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.