Cited by 348Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesMolecular spectroscopy and chirality

The NICS‐ XY ‐Scan: Identification of Local and Global Ring Currents in Multi‐Ring Systems

Gershoni‐Poranne, Renana, Stanger, Amnon·2014·Chemistry – A European Journal

Abstract

Nucleus‐independent chemical shift (NICS)‐based methods are very popular for the determination of the induced magnetic field under an external magnetic field. These methods are used mostly (but not only) for the determination of the aromaticity and antiaromaticity of molecules and ions, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The ghost atom that serves as the NICS probe senses the induced magnetic field and reports it in the form of an NMR chemical shift. However, the source of the field cannot be determined by NICS. Thus, in a multi‐ring system that may contain more than one induced current circuit (and therefore more than one source of the induced magnetic field) the NICS value may represent the sum of many induced magnetic fields. This may lead to wrong assignments of the aromaticity (and antiaromaticity) of the systems under study. In this paper, we present a NICS‐based method for the determination of local and global ring currents in conjugated multi‐ring systems. The method involves placing the NICS probes along the X axis, and if needed, along the Y axis, at a constant height above the system under study. Following the change in the induced field along these axes allows the identification of global and local induced currents. The best NICS type to use for these scans is NICS πZZ , but it is shown that at a height of 1.7 Å above the molecular plane, NICS ZZ provides the same qualitative picture. This method, namely the NICS‐ XY ‐scan, gives information equivalent to that obtained through current density analysis methods, and in some cases, provides even more details.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/chem.201304307

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gershoni‐Poranne, R., & Stanger, A.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Corresponding author
Stanger, Amnon
Venue
Chemistry – A European Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-27
Volume
20
Issue
19
Pages
5673-5688
ISSN
  • 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3765
OpenAlex
W2118946568
Cited by
348
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemistry - A European Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
Keywords
nucleus-independent chemical shift, ring current, induced magnetic field, aromaticity, antiaromaticity, conjugated molecules

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review