The NICS‐ XY ‐Scan: Identification of Local and Global Ring Currents in Multi‐Ring Systems
Abstract
Nucleus‐independent chemical shift (NICS)‐based methods are very popular for the determination of the induced magnetic field under an external magnetic field. These methods are used mostly (but not only) for the determination of the aromaticity and antiaromaticity of molecules and ions, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The ghost atom that serves as the NICS probe senses the induced magnetic field and reports it in the form of an NMR chemical shift. However, the source of the field cannot be determined by NICS. Thus, in a multi‐ring system that may contain more than one induced current circuit (and therefore more than one source of the induced magnetic field) the NICS value may represent the sum of many induced magnetic fields. This may lead to wrong assignments of the aromaticity (and antiaromaticity) of the systems under study. In this paper, we present a NICS‐based method for the determination of local and global ring currents in conjugated multi‐ring systems. The method involves placing the NICS probes along the X axis, and if needed, along the Y axis, at a constant height above the system under study. Following the change in the induced field along these axes allows the identification of global and local induced currents. The best NICS type to use for these scans is NICS πZZ , but it is shown that at a height of 1.7 Å above the molecular plane, NICS ZZ provides the same qualitative picture. This method, namely the NICS‐ XY ‐scan, gives information equivalent to that obtained through current density analysis methods, and in some cases, provides even more details.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The magnetic response of C2N (N = 3-14) rings is directly related to aromatic/antiaromatic behavior.
“We perform a detailed analysis of the magnetic response of C 2N (N = 3-14) rings which is directly related to the aromatic/antiaromatic behavior, [37][38][39][40][41][42]”
From Induced magnetic field in sp-hybridized carbon rings: analysis of double aromaticity and antiaromaticity in cyclo[2 <i>N</i> ]carbon allotropes (2020) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts (NICS) as an Aromaticity Criterion
Chen, Z., Wannere, C. S., Corminboeuf, C., Puchta, R., & Schleyer, P. V. R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030088+ · Cited by 3,847 · see citing works
Which NICS Aromaticity Index for Planar π Rings Is Best?
Fallah-Bagher-Shaidaei, H., Wannere, C. S., Corminboeuf, C., Puchta, R., & Schleyer, P. V. R. (2006) · Organic Letters · doi:10.1021/ol0529546 · Cited by 1,257 · see citing works
Bohmann, J. A., Weinhold, F., & Farrar, T. C. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.474464 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Charistos, N. D., & Muñoz-Castro, A. (2020) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d0cp01252a · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity: How to Define Them
Baranac-Stojanović, M. (2025) · Chemistry · doi:10.3390/chemistry7040127 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gershoni‐Poranne, R., & Stanger, A.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Stanger, Amnon
- Venue
- Chemistry – A European Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03-27
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 5673-5688
- ISSN
- 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3765
- OpenAlex
- W2118946568
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemistry - A European Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Israel Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
- Keywords
- nucleus-independent chemical shift, ring current, induced magnetic field, aromaticity, antiaromaticity, conjugated molecules
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review