The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene and Graphene Oxide for Energy Storage and Electrochemistry Applications
Abstract
Top‐down methods are of key importance for large‐scale graphene and graphene oxide preparation. Electrochemical exfoliation of graphite has lately gained much interest because of the simplicity of execution, the short process time, and the good quality of graphene that can be obtained. Here, we test three different electrolytes, that is, H 2 SO 4, Na 2 SO 4, and LiClO 4, with a common exfoliation procedure to evaluate the difference in structural and chemical properties that result for the graphene. The properties are analyzed by means of scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), Raman spectroscopy, and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. We then tested the graphene materials for electrochemical applications, measuring the heterogeneous electron transfer (HET) rates with a Fe(CN)63−/4− redox probe, and their capacitive behavior in alkaline solutions. We correlate the electrochemical features with the presence of structural defects and oxygen functionalities on the graphene materials. In particular, the use of LiClO 4 during the electrochemical exfoliation of graphite allowed the formation of highly oxidized graphene with a C/O ratio close to 4.0 and represents a possible avenue for the mass production of graphene oxide as valid alternative to the current laborious and dangerous chemical procedures, which also have limited scalability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The electronic properties of graphene
Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.109 · Cited by 24,803
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
Cited by
Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites
Papageorgiou, D. G., Kinloch, I. A., & Young, R. J. (2017) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 · Cited by 2,579
Graphene and its electrochemistry – an update
Ambrosi, A., Chua, C. K., Latiff, N. M., Loo, A. H., Wong, C. H. A., Eng, A. Y. S., Bonanni, A., & Pumera, M. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00136j · Cited by 469
Self-citationBrisebois, P. P., & Siaj, M. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c9tc03251g · Cited by 445
Synthesis of graphene materials by electrochemical exfoliation: Recent progress and future potential
Liu, F., Wang, C., Sui, X., Riaz, M. A., Xu, M., Wei, L., & Chen, Y. (2019) · Carbon Energy · doi:10.1002/cey2.14 · Cited by 407
Synthesis, structure and applications of graphene-based 2D heterostructures
Solís-Fernández, P., Bissett, M., & Ago, H. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00160f · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Ambrosi, A., & Pumera, M.
- Venue
- Chemistry – A European Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-159
- ISSN
- 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3765
- OpenAlex
- W1866812925
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene and Graphene Oxide for Energy Storage and Electrochemistry Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.201503110
- The paper
- Ambrosi, A., & Pumera, M. (2016). Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene and Graphene Oxide for Energy Storage and Electrochemistry Applications. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201503110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.