Green Analytical Methodologies
Abstract
ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 200 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract, please click on HTML or PDF.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many researchers have increased the synthesis of hydrophobic DES for efficient isolation of contaminants from both liquid and solid matrices.
“Thus, in recent years, many researchers have also increased the syn thesis of hydrophobic DES (water-immiscible DES) for efficient isolation of contaminants from both liquid and solid matrices (58-62).”
From Evaluating the green credentials and performance of deep eutectic solvents in the extraction of antibiotics and mycotoxins in foods (2024) · cites this paper as [60]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 1 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Keith, L. H., Gron, L. U., & Young, J. L.
- ORCID
- Young, Jennifer L.
- Venue
- ChemInform
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-22
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 37
- ISSN
- 0009-2975 (ISSN-L)
- 0931-7597
- 1522-2667
- OpenAlex
- W2951195147
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ChemInform (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
- Keywords
- green analytical chemistry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
