The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overview of Surrogate Modeling in Chemical Process Engineering
Open accessAbstract
The ability to accurately model and simulate chemical processes has been paramount to the growing success and efficiency in process design and operation. These improvements usually come with increasing complexity of the underlying models leading to substantial computational effort in their use. It may also occur that the structure of the model is sometimes unknown making optimization and study difficult. To circumvent these issues, mathematically simpler models, commonly known as surrogate models, have been designed and used to successfully replace these complex, underlying models with much success. This technique has seen increasing use within the chemical process engineering field and this article summarizes some popular surrogates and their recent use in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on support vector regression
Smola, A. J., & Schölkopf, B. (2004) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/b:stco.0000035301.49549.88 · Cited by 13,387
Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions
Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M., & Welch, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008306431147 · Cited by 8,070
Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines
Friedman, J. H. (1991) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176347963 · Cited by 8,000
Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments
Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., & Wynn, H. P. (1989) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177012413 · Cited by 6,919
Neural Networks And Learning Machines
Haykin, S. (2010) · Cited by 6,609
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1268522 · Cited by 3,757
Surrogate-based analysis and optimization
Queipo, N. V., Haftka, R. T., Shyy, W., Goel, T., Vaidyanathan, R., & Kevin Tucker, P. (2005) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001 · Cited by 2,446
Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization
Forrester, A. I. J., & Keane, A. J. (2009) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001 · Cited by 2,357
Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide
Forrester, A. I. J., Sóbester, A., & Keane, A. J. (2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470770801 · Cited by 2,309
A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces
Jones, D. R. (2001) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1012771025575 · Cited by 2,159
Cited by
Perspectives on the integration between first-principles and data-driven modeling
Bradley, W., Kim, J., Kilwein, Z., Blakely, L., Eydenberg, M., Jalvin, J., Laird, C., & Boukouvala, F. (2022) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107898 · Cited by 231
Quo vadis multiscale modeling in reaction engineering? – A perspective
Wehinger, G. D., Ambrosetti, M., Cheula, R., Ding, Z.-B., Isoz, M., Kreitz, B., Kuhlmann, K., Kutscherauer, M., Niyogi, K., Poissonnier, J., et al. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Research and Design · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2022.05.030 · Cited by 64
Bracconi, M. (2022) · Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2022.109148 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- McBride, K., & Sundmacher, K.
- Venue
- Chemie Ingenieur Technik
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-03
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 228-239
- ISSN
- 0009-286X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2640
- OpenAlex
- W2907578745
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 18.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of Surrogate Modeling in Chemical Process Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cite.201800091
- The paper
- McBride, K., & Sundmacher, K. (2019). Overview of Surrogate Modeling in Chemical Process Engineering. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
