The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlations for wall and particle shape effects on fixed bed bulk voidage
Abstract
Correlations have been derived, by both geometrical arguments and empirical treatment of data, for the bulk void fraction in a fixed bed. The void fraction has been correlated as a function of particle‐to‐tube diameter ratio for packings of spheres and equilateral solid cylinders. Prediction of void fraction for equilateral hollow cylinders can be made from the solid cylinder correlation, provided a correction factor is included that allows for internal voidage and interpenetration of packings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mueller, G. E. (1992) · Powder Technology · doi:10.1016/0032-5910(92)80045-x · Cited by 275
Review on the structure of random packed‐beds
von Seckendorff, J., & Hinrichsen, O. (2021) · The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cjce.23959 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixon, A. G.
- Venue
- The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 705-708
- ISSN
- 0008-4034 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-019X
- OpenAlex
- W1999047807
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlations for wall and particle shape effects on fixed bed bulk voidage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cjce.5450660501
- The paper
- Dixon, A. G. (1988). Correlations for wall and particle shape effects on fixed bed bulk voidage. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450660501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
