The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of the Aldosterone‐blocking Agents Eplerenone and Spironolactone
Open accessAbstract
Improved understanding of the adverse pharmacological properties of aldosterone has prompted investigation of the clinical benefits of blocking aldosterone at the receptor level. This article reviews the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of the two available blocking agents, spironolactone and eplerenone. A Medline search identified clinical studies assessing spironolactone and eplerenone. Priority was given to large, well‐controlled, clinical trials and comparative studies. Pharmacological differences between spironolactone and eplerenone include lower affinity of eplerenone for progesterone, androgen, and glucocorticoid receptors; more consistently demonstrated nongenomic properties for eplerenone; and the presence of long‐acting metabolites for spironolactone. Both agents effectively treat hypertension and heart failure but comparisons are complicated by the deficiency of head‐to‐head trials and differences between patient populations. There are differences in the tolerability profiles; spironolactone is associated with dose‐dependent sexual side effects. Both agents produce dose‐dependent increases in potassium concentrations, although the effect with spironolactone appears to be greater when both agents are administered at recommended doses. Choice of a specific agent should be based on individual patient issues, such as the nature of heart failure and patient concerns about adverse events. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Spironolactone on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Severe Heart Failure
Pitt, B., Zannad, F., Remme, W. J., Cody, R., Castaigne, A., Perez, A., Palensky, J., & Wittes, J. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199909023411001 · Cited by 9,214
Pitt, B., Remme, W., Zannad, F., Neaton, J., Martinez, F., Roniker, B., Bittman, R., Hurley, S., Kleiman, J., & Gatlin, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030207 · Cited by 4,941
Cited by
Congestion in heart failure: a contemporary look at physiology, diagnosis and treatment
Boorsma, E. M., ter Maaten, J. M., Damman, K., Dinh, W., Gustafsson, F., Goldsmith, S., Burkhoff, D., Zannad, F., Udelson, J. E., & Voors, A. A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-020-0379-7 · Cited by 365
Erectile dysfunction and diabetes: A melting pot of circumstances and treatments
Defeudis, G., Mazzilli, R., Tenuta, M., Rossini, G., Zamponi, V., Olana, S., Faggiano, A., Pozzilli, P., Isidori, A. M., & Gianfrilli, D. (2022) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3494 · Cited by 285
Parthasarathy, H. K., Ménard, J., White, W. B., Young, W. F., Williams, G. H., Williams, B., Ruilope, L. M., McInnes, G. T., Connell, J. M., & MacDonald, T. M. (2011) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e3283455ca5 · Cited by 281
Self-citationLionakis, N. (2012) · World Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.4330/wjc.v4.i5.135 · Cited by 258
Thirst and hydration: Physiology and consequences of dysfunction
Thornton, S. N. (2010) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.02.026 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Struthers, A., Krum, H., & Williams, G. H.
- Venue
- Clinical Cardiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 153-158
- ISSN
- 0160-9289 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-8737
- OpenAlex
- W2062266308
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of the Aldosterone‐blocking Agents Eplerenone and Spironolactone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/clc.20324
- The paper
- Struthers, A., Krum, H., & Williams, G. H. (2008). A Comparison of the Aldosterone‐blocking Agents Eplerenone and Spironolactone. Clinical Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.