Cited by 28Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Unexplained syncope: implications of age and gender on patient characteristics and evaluation, the diagnostic yield of an implantable loop recorder, and the subsequent treatment

Open access
Edvardsson, Nils, Garutti, Claudio, Rieger, Guido, Linker, Nicholas J., for the PICTURE Study Investigators·2014·Clinical Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a common clinical problem with a variety of underlying mechanisms, some of which occur more frequently in 1 of the sexes or at a certain age. HYPOTHESIS: There may be clinically significant age- and gender-related differences in patients with unexplained syncope. METHODS: Five hundred seventy patients (54% women) with unexplained syncope received an implantable loop recorder (ILR) and were followed until diagnosis or for at least 1 year. RESULTS: Women were older and more prone to severe trauma during syncope (40.8% vs 29.9%, P = 0.007), and hospitalization was more common at ≥65 years (P = 0.003) without gender difference. Muscle spasms or grand mal seizures were more common in men and at <65 years old. Carotid sinus pressure, exercise testing, coronary angiography and magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography scans were more commonly performed in men, whereas no test was more common in women. Tilt testing, exercise test, electroencephalography, and neurological or psychiatric evaluation were more common at ≥65 years. There were no age- or gender-related differences in the diagnostic yield of the ILR, whereas patients ≥65 years old more often received specific treatment based on ILR data. CONCLUSIONS: Gender and/or age had relevance for the clinical evaluation, rate of recurrence, and subsequent specific treatment but not for the diagnostic yield of the ILR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/clc.22300

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ILR was more cost-effective than a conventional strategy.

    “ILR was more cost-effective than a conventional strategy. 172,173,177,178”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [177]

    The Methods describe an observational study of patients receiving an ILR, and the Results report diagnostic testing and treatment, not a cost-effectiveness comparison. Searches for cost-effectiveness, costs, and a conventional diagnostic strategy found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 28

Authors
Edvardsson, N., Garutti, C., Rieger, G., Linker, N. J., & for the PICTURE Study Investigators
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Medtronic (Netherlands) (NL)
  • James Cook University Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Edvardsson, Nils
Venue
Clinical Cardiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-28
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
618-625
ISSN
  • 0160-9289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-8737
OpenAlex
W1577109071
Cited by
28
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medtronic
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
unexplained syncope, implantable loop recorder, age differences, gender differences, diagnostic yield, syncope evaluation, syncope treatment, carotid sinus syndrome, tilt table test, exercise testing, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, syncope recurrence
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Adult, Age Factors, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Syncope, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review