Cited by 83Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesSleep and related disorders

The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation

Open access
Abumuamar, Asmaa M., Dorian, Paul, Newman, David, Shapiro, Colin M.·2018·Clinical Cardiology

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a systemic disorder associated with significant cardiovascular complications. OSA may play a role in the initiation and worsening of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to determine the prevalence and clinical predictors of OSA in patients with AF. Hypothesis: OSA is underdiagnosed in a large number of patients with AF and may not be predicted by conventional clinical indices. Methods: Consecutive nonselected patients with AF were recruited from different arrhythmia clinics in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Patients with previous diagnosis and/or treatment of OSA were excluded. Patients underwent 2 consecutive nights of ambulatory sleep testing with full electroencephalogram recording. OSA was defined as an Apnea‐Hypopnea Index (AHI) score ≥ 5 per hour of sleep. Results: 123 patients with AF were recruited, with 100 patients included in the final analysis. OSA was detected in 85% of these patients. 27% of patients with normal overall AHI had an increased AHI during rapid eye movement sleep. Only age and male sex were independent predictors of the presence of OSA in these patients. Conclusions: OSA is common and often undetected in patients with AF, especially in nonobese and/or female patients. Patients may have a normal overall AHI but an abnormal AHI during rapid eye movement sleep. The clinical relevance and therapeutic implications in this subgroup should be further investigated. The clinical features of OSA are not reliable predictors of OSA in patients with AF. A low threshold for detection of OSA, with sleep studies, in these patients may be merited.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/clc.22933

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies that systematically evaluated atrial fibrillation patients using home or laboratory sleep testing report a prevalence of OSA (AHI ≥5) of 43%-85%, with prevalence >75% in most studies.

    “Despite these limitations, studies that systematically evaluated AF patients using home or laboratory sleep testing report a prevalence of OSA (AHI ≥ 5) of 43%–85%, with prevalence >75% in most studies.704–710”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [704]

    The Results (§3.2; page not available) report OSA in 85% of AF patients, using the AHI ≥5 definition and home sleep testing described in §2.2. This supports the upper end of the cited range, but this paper does not establish the 43% lower end or that prevalence exceeded 75% in most studies. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with atrial fibrillation have a high prevalence of OSA.

    “Patients with AF have a high prevalence of OSA.”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [704]

  • Moderate or severe OSA (AHI ≥15) is reported in 20%-62% of atrial fibrillation patients.

    “Moderate or severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15) is reported in 20%–62%.330,704,706,710–715”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [704]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 83

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]26. Young T, Finn L, Austin D, et al. Menopausal status and sleep-disordered breathing in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1181-1185.

Authors
Abumuamar, A. M., Dorian, P., Newman, D., & Shapiro, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Abumuamar, Asmaa M.
Venue
Clinical Cardiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
601-607
ISSN
  • 0160-9289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-8737
OpenAlex
W2799314917
Cited by
83
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
The Neurozone MSH Inc Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation, prevalence, underdiagnosis, REM sleep, apnea-hypopnea index, clinical predictors, age, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ontario, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Sleep, REM, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review