Assessment of mental health in patients with chronic liver disease
Open accessAbstract
Content available: Audio Recording.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PHQ-9 and GAD-7 are free, patient-administered, with sensitivity >85% and specificity >76% to detect depression and anxiety.
“These are free tools, patient-administered with adequate sensitivity and specificity to detect depression and anxiety (sensitivity >85% and specificity >76%)15”
From Management of depression/anxiety in patients with chronic liver disease (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Table 1 in “Patient self-report tools” lists PHQ-9 and GAD-7 as free online, patient-administered tools. The same section describes PHQ-9 as accurate for detecting depression and GAD-7 as having adequate sensitivity and specificity for anxiety, but does not give the claimed >85% sensitivity and >76% specificity for both tools. Its 86% and 83% figures are stated for GAD-2, which it describes as having similar performance to GAD-7. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWhitsett and colleagues summarized some screening tools to assess depression and anxiety in patients with chronic liver disease.
“Whitsett and colleagues summarized some screening tools to assess depression and anxiety in patients with chronic liver disease.”
From Management of depression/anxiety in patients with chronic liver disease (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 17
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Siu AL, Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Baumann LC, Davidson KW, Ebell M, et al. Screening for depression in adults. JAMA. 2016;315:380.
- Authors
- Whitsett, M. P., Goswami Banerjee, A., & Serper, M.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Psychiatry,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania,USA
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Serper, Marina
- Venue
- Clinical Liver Disease
- Published
- 2022-07-16
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 52-56
- ISSN
- 2046-2484 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9405502
- OpenAlex
- W4285587875
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- mental health, chronic liver disease, depression, anxiety, psychological assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
