The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sonolytic Decolorization of Textile Wastewater Containing a Mixture of Reactive, Acid and Disperse Dyes
Abstract
The effect of chemical additives in combination with ultrasonication (US) was evaluated for the decolorization of simulated synthetic textile wastewaters containing Reactive Black 5 (RB5), Congo Red (CR), and Disperse Blue 3 (DB3). Maximum decolorization of 93% was achieved for the wastewater containing RB5 (50 mg L−1) at 8 h sonication time and US power density of 1 W mL−1. Persulfate (PS) assisted US was appeared to be better over the sodium sulfate (SS)‐assisted US, giving 87.51% decolorization efficiency for the textile wastewater containing all the three dyes together (200 mg L−1) at a PS dosage of 1500 mg L−1 and the sonication time of 120 min. The rate of sonolytic decolorization followed first‐order kinetics for the textile wastewater containing RB5 and CR. The results of this study indicate that, with an increase in the sonication time, the decolorization efficiency increases for the textile wastewater containing RB5 and CR, but decreases for that containing DB3.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although it is mainly the mixtures of dyes that are encountered in the actual effluents from textile industry, there are very limited reports examining such mixtures of dyes 216-218 and even fewer that include an anthraquinone dye within the dye mixture 155, 219, 220 .”
From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [219]
Citations
Cites
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
Jenkins, S. H. (1982) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/0043-1354(82)90249-4 · Cited by 30,002
Degradation of chlorophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes: a general review
Pera-Titus, M., Garcı́a-Molina, V., Baños, M. A., Giménez, J., & Esplugas, S. (2004) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.09.010 · Cited by 2,225
Gogate, P. R., & Pandit, A. B. (2004) · Advances in Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/s1093-0191(03)00032-7 · Cited by 1,737
DANESHVAR, N., OLADEGARAGOZE, A., & DJAFARZADEH, N. (2006) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.08.033 · Cited by 620
Antoniou, M. G., de la Cruz, A. A., & Dionysiou, D. D. (2010) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.02.013 · Cited by 607
Power measurement in sonochemistry
Contamine, R. F., Wilhelm, A. M., Berlan, J., & Delmas, H. (1995) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/1350-4177(94)00010-p · Cited by 329
Feasibility study of ultraviolet activated persulfate oxidation of phenol
Lin, Y.-T., Liang, C., & Chen, J.-H. (2011) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.027 · Cited by 274
Degradation of amoxicillin in aqueous solution using sulphate radicals under ultrasound irradiation
Su, S., Guo, W., Yi, C., et al. (2011) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.10.005 · Cited by 249
Kaur, S., & Singh, V. (2007) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.09.015 · Cited by 225
Liu, H., Li, G., Qu, J., & Liu, H. (2006) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.009 · Cited by 186
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Eswaramoorthi S., 2008, Advances in Textile Wastewater Treatment: The Case for UV‐Ozonation and Membrane Bioreactor for Common Effluent Treatment Plants in Tirupur
- Hunger K., 2005, Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry
Cited by
Routoula, E., & Patwardhan, S. V. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03737 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, A. K., Bhunia, P., Dash, R. R., Tyagi, R. D., Surampalli, R. Y., & Zhang, T. C.
- Venue
- CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-15
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 767-774
- ISSN
- 1863-0650
- 1863-0669
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 29
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
