The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SyGMa: Combining Expert Knowledge and Empirical Scoring in the Prediction of Metabolites
Abstract
Predictions of potential metabolites based on chemical structure are becoming increasingly important in drug discovery to guide medicinal chemistry efforts that address metabolic issues and to support experimental metabolite screening and identification. Herein we present a novel rule‐based method, SyGMa (Systematic Generation of potential Metabolites), to predict the potential metabolites of a given parent structure. A set of reaction rules covering a broad range of phase 1 and phase 2 metabolism has been derived from metabolic reactions reported in the Metabolite Database to occur in humans. An empirical probability score is assigned to each rule representing the fraction of correctly predicted metabolites in the training database. This score is used to refine the rules and to rank predicted metabolites. The current rule set of SyGMa covers approximately 70 % of biotransformation reactions observed in humans. Evaluation of the rule‐based predictions demonstrated a significant enrichment of true metabolites in the top of the ranking list: while in total, 68 % of all observed metabolites in an independent test set were reproduced by SyGMa, a large part, 30 % of the observed metabolites, were identified among the top three predictions. From a subset of cytochrome P450 specific metabolites, 84 % were reproduced overall, with 66 % in the top three predicted phase 1 metabolites. A similarity analysis of the reactions present in the database was performed to obtain an overview of the metabolic reactions predicted by SyGMa and to support ongoing efforts to extend the rules. Specific examples demonstrate the use of SyGMa in experimental metabolite identification and the application of SyGMa to suggest chemical modifications that improve the metabolic stability of compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Djoumbou-Feunang, Y., Fiamoncini, J., Gil-de-la-Fuente, A., Greiner, R., Manach, C., & Wishart, D. S. (2019) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-018-0324-5 · Cited by 508
Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation?
Kirchmair, J., Göller, A. H., Lang, D., Kunze, J., Testa, B., Wilson, I. D., Glen, R. C., & Schneider, G. (2015) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4581 · Cited by 502
In silico ADME/T modelling for rational drug design
Wang, Y., Xing, J., Xu, Y., Zhou, N., Peng, J., Xiong, Z., Liu, X., Luo, X., Luo, C., Chen, K., et al. (2015) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583515000190 · Cited by 367
Propagating annotations of molecular networks using in silico fragmentation
da Silva, R. R., Wang, M., Nothias, L.-F., van der Hooft, J. J. J., Caraballo-Rodríguez, A. M., Fox, E., Balunas, M. J., Klassen, J. L., Lopes, N. P., & Dorrestein, P. C. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006089 · Cited by 363
Computational Prediction of Metabolism: Sites, Products, SAR, P450 Enzyme Dynamics, and Mechanisms
Kirchmair, J., Williamson, M. J., Tyzack, J. D., Tan, L., Bond, P. J., Bender, A., & Glen, R. C. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200542m · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Ridder, L., & Wagener, M.
- Venue
- ChemMedChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 821-832
- ISSN
- 1860-7179 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-7187
- OpenAlex
- W2008420299
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SyGMa: Combining Expert Knowledge and Empirical Scoring in the Prediction of Metabolites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cmdc.200700312
- The paper
- Ridder, L., & Wagener, M. (2008). SyGMa: Combining Expert Knowledge and Empirical Scoring in the Prediction of Metabolites. ChemMedChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.200700312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.